12 shops, 123 162 producten

Vergelijking: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Inhoudstafel:

Samenvatting
Nat
Droog
Sneeuw
Ijs
Kosten
Wederzijdse tests
Aanschaf %

#	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 /0%	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 /82%	Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ /87%	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /81%

Afmetingen	R14 - R21	R14 - R22	R0 - R21	R14 - R19
Prijs	Stel dimensie in om prijzen te zien	Stel dimensie in om prijzen te zien	Stel dimensie in om prijzen te zien	Stel dimensie in om prijzen te zien
Verwijderen	Verwijderen uit vergelijking	Verwijderen uit vergelijking	Verwijderen uit vergelijking	Verwijderen uit vergelijking

Segment

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premie

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premie

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Bovenmidden

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Bovenmidden

Aantal beschikbare maten

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 213

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 132

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 97

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

Aantal tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 49x

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 23x

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 15x

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 3x

Beste positie in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 1.

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 4.

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 4.

Slechtste positie in de test

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 5.

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 15.

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 18.

Gemiddelde positie in tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 3.2

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 4.33

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.65

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 7.87

Jaar van de laatste test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2025

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 2025

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 2024

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 2018

Beste beoordeling in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Zeer goed

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Zeer goed

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Fijn

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Fijn

Slechtste beoordeling in de test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Fijn

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Fijn

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Fijn

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Voorwaardelijk aanbevolen

Nat

(Algemene score)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

89%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

78%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

78%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

69%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 87%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 86%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 86%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 72%

Remmen op nat wegdek

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 95%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 84%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 67%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 62%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 93%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 86%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 80%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 84%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 80%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 76%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 66%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 90%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 81%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 67%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 65%

Remmen op nat wegdek volgens eu-label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 A

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ B

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 B

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

Droog

(Algemene score)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

83%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

82%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

78%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

72%

Droogremmen

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 84%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 81%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 80%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 72%

Droge prestaties

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 88%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 78%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 77%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

Droog rijgedrag

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 82%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 83%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

Droge behandeling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 89%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 77%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 72%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 67%

Kosten

(Algemene score)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

77%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

76%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

75%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

74%

Rolweerstand

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 87%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 78%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 69%

Kilometrage

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 76%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 69%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 64%

Prijs/waarde

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 84%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 70%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 68%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 60%

Brandstofverbruik volgens eu-label

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ C

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 C

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 C

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

Sneeuw

(Algemene score)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

93%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

80%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

78%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

78%

Remmen op sneeuw

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 93%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 88%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 86%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 80%

Sneeuwverwerking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 90%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 86%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 77%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 72%

Tractie op sneeuw

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 82%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 78%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 76%

Soelaas

(Algemene score)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

82%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

82%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

54%

Buitengeluid

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 83%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 79%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 75%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 72%

Inwendig geluid

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 85%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 81%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 33%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

Buitengeluid volgens eu-label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 71 dB

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 ?

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ ?

Ijs

(Algemene score)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

80%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

80%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

0%

Remmen op ijs

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 82%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 80%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 79%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

Zijdelingse geleiding van het ijs

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 81%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 82%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 78%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Maken

Model

Vergelijking: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

De zomer

Ranglijstjes

Testen

Merken

Ranglijstjes

Testen

Merken

Winter

Ranglijstjes

Testen

Merken

Ranglijstjes

Testen

Merken

Allround

Ranglijstjes

Testen

Merken

Ranglijstjes

Testen

Merken