12 shops, 123 162 producten

Vergelijking: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

Inhoudstafel:

Samenvatting
Nat
Droog
Sneeuw
Ijs
Kosten
Wederzijdse tests
Aanschaf %

#	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 /0%	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 /82%	Continental WinterContact TS 870 P /93%	GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 /95%	Continental WinterContact TS 870 /99%	Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ /87%

Afmetingen	R14 - R21	R14 - R22	R16 - R22	R14 - R22	R14 - R18	R0 - R21
Prijs	Stel dimensie in om prijzen te zien	Stel dimensie in om prijzen te zien	Stel dimensie in om prijzen te zien	Stel dimensie in om prijzen te zien	Stel dimensie in om prijzen te zien	Stel dimensie in om prijzen te zien
Verwijderen	Verwijderen uit vergelijking	Verwijderen uit vergelijking	Verwijderen uit vergelijking	Verwijderen uit vergelijking	Verwijderen uit vergelijking	Verwijderen uit vergelijking

Segment

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premie

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premie

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Premie

4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 Premie

5. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Premie

6. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Bovenmidden

Aantal beschikbare maten

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 265

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 213

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 178

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 132

5. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 97

6. Continental WinterContact TS 870 80

Aantal tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 49x

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 29x

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 24x

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 17x

5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 15x

6. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 3x

Beste positie in test

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 1.

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 1.

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 1.

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 1.

5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 4.

6. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 4.

Slechtste positie in de test

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 5.

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 8.

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 9.

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 13.

5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 15.

6. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 18.

Gemiddelde positie in tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 1.71

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 2.67

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 3.2

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 3.66

5. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 4.33

6. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 7.87

Jaar van de laatste test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 2025

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 2025

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 2025

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 2024

5. Continental WinterContact TS 870 2024

6. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 2018

Beste beoordeling in test

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 Testwinnaar

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Testwinnaar

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Zeer goed

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Zeer goed

5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Fijn

6. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Fijn

Slechtste beoordeling in de test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Fijn

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Fijn

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Fijn

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Fijn

5. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 Geadviseerd

6. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Voorwaardelijk aanbevolen

Nat

(Algemene score)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

89%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

88%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

81%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

78%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

78%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

78%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 94%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 87%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 86%

4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 74%

5. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 74%

6. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 72%

Remmen op nat wegdek

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 95%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 87%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 84%

4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 80%

5. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 76%

6. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 62%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 93%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 91%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 92%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 86%

5. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 82%

6. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 80%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 93%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 84%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 80%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 78%

5. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 74%

6. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 66%

Natte prestaties

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 84%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 82%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 81%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 77%

5. Continental WinterContact TS 870 0%

6. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 0%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 94%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 90%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 86%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 81%

5. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 79%

6. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 67%

Remmen op nat wegdek volgens eu-label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 A

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 B

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 B

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ B

5. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P B

6. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 B

Droog

(Algemene score)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

86%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

83%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

82%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

82%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

79%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

78%

Droogremmen

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 86%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 84%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 81%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 80%

5. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 74%

6. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 72%

Droge prestaties

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 88%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 78%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 77%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 59%

5. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 56%

6. Continental WinterContact TS 870 0%

Droog rijgedrag

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 100%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 91%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 82%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 83%

5. Continental WinterContact TS 870 78%

6. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

Droge behandeling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 91%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 89%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 87%

4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 82%

5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 77%

6. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 72%

Kosten

(Algemene score)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

80%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

76%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

75%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

74%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

66%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

59%

Rolweerstand

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 92%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 89%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 87%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 78%

5. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 75%

6. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 69%

Kilometrage

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 83%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 76%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 69%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 64%

5. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 56%

6. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 37%

Prijs/waarde

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 84%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 70%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 68%

4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 68%

5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 60%

6. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 49%

Brandstofverbruik volgens eu-label

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ C

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 C

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 C

4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 C

5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 C

6. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P C

Sneeuw

(Algemene score)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

89%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

80%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

78%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

78%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

77%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

73%

Remmen op sneeuw

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 90%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 88%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 86%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 79%

5. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 80%

6. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 77%

Sneeuwverwerking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 90%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 86%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 77%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 72%

5. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 65%

6. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 62%

Tractie op sneeuw

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 87%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 82%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 78%

4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 79%

5. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 76%

6. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 75%

Soelaas

(Algemene score)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

92%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

82%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

82%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

81%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

54%

Buitengeluid

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 86%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 81%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 80%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 79%

5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 75%

6. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 72%

Inwendig geluid

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 98%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 85%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 84%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 80%

5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 33%

6. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

Buitengeluid volgens eu-label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 71 dB

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 ?

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 ?

4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 ?

5. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P ?

6. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ ?

Ijs

(Algemene score)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

85%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

80%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

80%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

0%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

0%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

0%

Remmen op ijs

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 85%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 82%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 79%

4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 -27%

5. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P -27%

6. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Maken

Model

Vergelijking: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

De zomer

Ranglijstjes

Testen

Merken

Ranglijstjes

Testen

Merken

Winter

Ranglijstjes

Testen

Merken

Ranglijstjes

Testen

Merken

Allround

Ranglijstjes

Testen

Merken

Ranglijstjes

Testen

Merken