Vergelijking: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premie

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Bovenmidden

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Bovenmidden

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 132

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 97

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 23x

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 15x

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 3x

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 4.

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 4.

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 5.

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 18.

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 4.33

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.65

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 7.87

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2025

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 2025

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 2018

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Zeer goed

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Fijn

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Fijn

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Fijn

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Fijn

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Fijn

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

78%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

78%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

69%

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 84%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 67%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 62%

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 86%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 80%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 80%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 76%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 66%

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 87%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 86%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 72%

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 81%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 67%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 65%

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ B

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 B

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

83%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

78%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

72%

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 84%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 80%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 72%

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 77%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 72%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 67%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

77%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

76%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

74%

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 76%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 69%

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 84%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 70%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 68%

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 78%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 69%

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 C

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ C

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

93%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

80%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

78%

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 93%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 88%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 80%

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 90%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 86%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 77%

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 78%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 76%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

82%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

54%

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 83%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 75%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 72%

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 71 dB

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ ?

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

80%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

0%