12 shops, 123 162 producten

Vergelijking: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3

Inhoudstafel:

Samenvatting
Nat
Droog
Sneeuw
Ijs
Kosten
Wederzijdse tests
Aanschaf %

#	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 /0%	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 /82%	Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 /81%

Afmetingen	R14 - R21	R14 - R22	R14 - R17
Prijs	Stel dimensie in om prijzen te zien	Stel dimensie in om prijzen te zien	Stel dimensie in om prijzen te zien
Verwijderen	Verwijderen uit vergelijking	Verwijderen uit vergelijking	Verwijderen uit vergelijking

Segment

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premie

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premie

3. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 Premie

Aantal beschikbare maten

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 213

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 132

3. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 78

Aantal tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 49x

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 15x

3. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 14x

Beste positie in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 1.

2. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 2.

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 4.

Slechtste positie in de test

1. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 14.

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 15.

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 18.

Gemiddelde positie in tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 3.2

2. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 5.5

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 7.87

Jaar van de laatste test

1. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 2025

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 2024

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 2018

Beste beoordeling in test

1. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 Sterk aanbevolen

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Zeer goed

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Fijn

Slechtste beoordeling in de test

1. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 Fijn

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Fijn

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Voorwaardelijk aanbevolen

Nat

(Algemene score)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

89%

Hankook
W462 Winter i*cept RS3

84%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

78%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

1. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 88%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 84%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 80%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

1. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 92%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 87%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 86%

Remmen op nat wegdek

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 95%

2. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 77%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 62%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 93%

2. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 81%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 80%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 90%

2. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 79%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 67%

Remmen op nat wegdek volgens eu-label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 A

2. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 B

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 B

Droog

(Algemene score)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

83%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

82%

Hankook
W462 Winter i*cept RS3

81%

Droogremmen

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 81%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 80%

3. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 74%

Droge behandeling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 89%

2. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 85%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 77%

Droog rijgedrag

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 82%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 83%

3. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 0%

Sneeuw

(Algemene score)

Hankook
W462 Winter i*cept RS3

81%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

78%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

78%

Tractie op sneeuw

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 82%

2. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 81%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 78%

Remmen op sneeuw

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 88%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 86%

3. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 83%

Sneeuwverwerking

1. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 78%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 77%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 72%

Kosten

(Algemene score)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

76%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

75%

Hankook
W462 Winter i*cept RS3

73%

Prijs/waarde

1. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 73%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 70%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 60%

Rolweerstand

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 87%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 78%

3. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 73%

Kilometrage

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 76%

2. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 74%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 64%

Brandstofverbruik volgens eu-label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 C

2. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 C

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 C

Soelaas

(Algemene score)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

82%

Hankook
W462 Winter i*cept RS3

75%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

54%

Buitengeluid

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 79%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 75%

3. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 65%

Inwendig geluid

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 85%

2. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 84%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 33%

Buitengeluid volgens eu-label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 71 dB

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 ?

3. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 ?

Ijs

(Algemene score)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

80%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

80%

Hankook
W462 Winter i*cept RS3

0%

Remmen op ijs

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 82%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 79%

3. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 0%

Zijdelingse geleiding van het ijs

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 82%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 78%

3. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 0%

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Maken

Model

Vergelijking: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

De zomer

Ranglijstjes

Testen

Merken

Ranglijstjes

Testen

Merken

Winter

Ranglijstjes

Testen

Merken

Ranglijstjes

Testen

Merken

Allround

Ranglijstjes

Testen

Merken

Ranglijstjes

Testen

Merken