12 shops, 123 162 producten

Vergelijking: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870

Inhoudstafel:

Samenvatting
Nat
Droog
Sneeuw
Ijs
Kosten
Wederzijdse tests
Aanschaf %

#	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 /0%	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 /82%	GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 /95%	Continental WinterContact TS 870 /99%

Afmetingen	R14 - R21	R14 - R22	R14 - R22	R14 - R18
Prijs	Stel dimensie in om prijzen te zien	Stel dimensie in om prijzen te zien	Stel dimensie in om prijzen te zien	Stel dimensie in om prijzen te zien
Verwijderen	Verwijderen uit vergelijking	Verwijderen uit vergelijking	Verwijderen uit vergelijking	Verwijderen uit vergelijking

Segment

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premie

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premie

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 Premie

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Premie

Aantal beschikbare maten

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 265

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 213

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 132

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 80

Aantal tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 49x

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 24x

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 17x

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 15x

Beste positie in test

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 1.

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 1.

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 1.

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 4.

Slechtste positie in de test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 8.

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 9.

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 15.

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 18.

Gemiddelde positie in tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 1.71

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 2.67

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 3.2

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 7.87

Jaar van de laatste test

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 2025

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 2024

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 2024

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 2018

Beste beoordeling in test

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 Testwinnaar

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Zeer goed

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Zeer goed

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Fijn

Slechtste beoordeling in de test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Fijn

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Fijn

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 Geadviseerd

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Voorwaardelijk aanbevolen

Nat

(Algemene score)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

89%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

88%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

81%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

78%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 93%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 84%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 80%

4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 74%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 94%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 87%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 86%

4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 74%

Remmen op nat wegdek

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 95%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 87%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 80%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 62%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 93%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 91%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 92%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 80%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 94%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 90%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 86%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 67%

Remmen op nat wegdek volgens eu-label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 A

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 B

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 B

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 B

Droog

(Algemene score)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

86%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

83%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

82%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

79%

Droogremmen

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 86%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 81%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 80%

4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 72%

Droog rijgedrag

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 100%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 82%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 83%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 78%

Droge behandeling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 91%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 89%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 82%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 77%

Droge prestaties

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 88%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 77%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 56%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 0%

Sneeuw

(Algemene score)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

89%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

78%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

78%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

73%

Tractie op sneeuw

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 87%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 82%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 78%

4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 79%

Remmen op sneeuw

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 90%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 88%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 86%

4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 77%

Sneeuwverwerking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 90%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 77%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 72%

4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 62%

Kosten

(Algemene score)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

80%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

76%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

75%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

66%

Prijs/waarde

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 70%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 68%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 68%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 60%

Rolweerstand

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 89%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 87%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 78%

4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 75%

Kilometrage

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 83%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 76%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 64%

4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 56%

Brandstofverbruik volgens eu-label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 C

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 C

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 C

4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 C

Soelaas

(Algemene score)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

92%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

82%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

82%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

54%

Buitengeluid

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 86%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 80%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 79%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 75%

Inwendig geluid

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 98%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 85%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 84%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 33%

Buitengeluid volgens eu-label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 71 dB

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 ?

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 ?

4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 ?

Ijs

(Algemene score)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

85%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

80%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

80%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

0%

Remmen op ijs

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 85%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 82%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 79%

4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 -27%

Zijdelingse geleiding van het ijs

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 82%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 78%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 0%

4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 0%

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Maken

Model

Vergelijking: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

De zomer

Ranglijstjes

Testen

Merken

Ranglijstjes

Testen

Merken

Winter

Ranglijstjes

Testen

Merken

Ranglijstjes

Testen

Merken

Allround

Ranglijstjes

Testen

Merken

Ranglijstjes

Testen

Merken