12 shops, 123 162 producten

Vergelijking: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Inhoudstafel:

Samenvatting
Nat
Droog
Sneeuw
Ijs
Kosten
Wederzijdse tests
Aanschaf %

#	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 /0%	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 /82%	Continental WinterContact TS 870 P /93%	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /81%

Afmetingen	R14 - R21	R14 - R22	R16 - R22	R14 - R19
Prijs	Stel dimensie in om prijzen te zien	Stel dimensie in om prijzen te zien	Stel dimensie in om prijzen te zien	Stel dimensie in om prijzen te zien
Verwijderen	Verwijderen uit vergelijking	Verwijderen uit vergelijking	Verwijderen uit vergelijking	Verwijderen uit vergelijking

Segment

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premie

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premie

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Premie

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Bovenmidden

Aantal beschikbare maten

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 213

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 178

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 132

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

Aantal tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 49x

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 29x

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 23x

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 15x

Beste positie in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 1.

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 1.

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 4.

Slechtste positie in de test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 13.

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 15.

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 18.

Gemiddelde positie in tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 3.2

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 3.66

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.65

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 7.87

Jaar van de laatste test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2025

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 2025

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 2024

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 2018

Beste beoordeling in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Testwinnaar

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Zeer goed

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Zeer goed

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Fijn

Slechtste beoordeling in de test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Fijn

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Fijn

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Fijn

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Voorwaardelijk aanbevolen

Nat

(Algemene score)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

89%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

78%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

78%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

69%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 93%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 82%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 80%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 84%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 80%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 78%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 76%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 87%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 86%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 86%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 74%

Remmen op nat wegdek

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 95%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 76%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 67%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 62%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 90%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 79%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 67%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 65%

Remmen op nat wegdek volgens eu-label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 A

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P B

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 B

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

Droog

(Algemene score)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

83%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

82%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

82%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

72%

Droogremmen

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 81%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 80%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 74%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 72%

Droog rijgedrag

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 91%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 82%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 83%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

Droge behandeling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 89%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 87%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 77%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 67%

Droge prestaties

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 88%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 77%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 59%

Kosten

(Algemene score)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

77%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

76%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

75%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

59%

Prijs/waarde

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 70%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 68%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 60%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 49%

Rolweerstand

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 92%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 87%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 78%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

Kilometrage

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 76%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 64%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 37%

Brandstofverbruik volgens eu-label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 C

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 C

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P C

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

Sneeuw

(Algemene score)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

93%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

78%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

78%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

77%

Sneeuwverwerking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 90%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 77%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 72%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 65%

Tractie op sneeuw

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 82%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 78%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 75%

Remmen op sneeuw

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 93%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 88%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 86%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 79%

Soelaas

(Algemene score)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

82%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

82%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

81%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

54%

Buitengeluid

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 83%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 81%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 79%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 75%

Inwendig geluid

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 85%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 81%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 80%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 33%

Buitengeluid volgens eu-label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 71 dB

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 ?

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P ?

Ijs

(Algemene score)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

80%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

80%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

0%

Remmen op ijs

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 82%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 80%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 79%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P -27%

Zijdelingse geleiding van het ijs

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 81%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 82%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 78%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 0%

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Maken

Model

Vergelijking: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

De zomer

Ranglijstjes

Testen

Merken

Ranglijstjes

Testen

Merken

Winter

Ranglijstjes

Testen

Merken

Ranglijstjes

Testen

Merken

Allround

Ranglijstjes

Testen

Merken

Ranglijstjes

Testen

Merken