12 shops, 123 162 producten

Vergelijking: Michelin Alpin 5 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870

Inhoudstafel:

Samenvatting
Nat
Droog
Sneeuw
Ijs
Kosten
Wederzijdse tests
Aanschaf %

#	Michelin Alpin 5 /0%	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 /82%	Continental WinterContact TS 870 P /93%	GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 /95%	Continental WinterContact TS 870 /99%

Afmetingen	R15 - R21	R14 - R22	R16 - R22	R14 - R22	R14 - R18
Prijs	Stel dimensie in om prijzen te zien	Stel dimensie in om prijzen te zien	Stel dimensie in om prijzen te zien	Stel dimensie in om prijzen te zien	Stel dimensie in om prijzen te zien
Verwijderen	Verwijderen uit vergelijking	Verwijderen uit vergelijking	Verwijderen uit vergelijking	Verwijderen uit vergelijking	Verwijderen uit vergelijking

Segment

1. Michelin Alpin 5 Premie

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premie

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Premie

4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 Premie

5. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Premie

Aantal beschikbare maten

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 265

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 213

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 178

4. Michelin Alpin 5 91

5. Continental WinterContact TS 870 80

Aantal tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 49x

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 29x

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 24x

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 17x

5. Michelin Alpin 5 17x

Beste positie in test

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 1.

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 1.

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 1.

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 1.

5. Michelin Alpin 5 2.

Slechtste positie in de test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 8.

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 9.

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 13.

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 15.

5. Michelin Alpin 5 17.

Gemiddelde positie in tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 1.71

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 2.67

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 3.2

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 3.66

5. Michelin Alpin 5 5.88

Jaar van de laatste test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 2025

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 2025

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 2024

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 2024

5. Michelin Alpin 5 2018

Beste beoordeling in test

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 Testwinnaar

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Testwinnaar

3. Michelin Alpin 5 Zeer goed

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Zeer goed

5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Zeer goed

Slechtste beoordeling in de test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Fijn

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Fijn

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 Geadviseerd

4. Michelin Alpin 5 Geadviseerd

5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Voorwaardelijk aanbevolen

Nat

(Algemene score)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

92%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

89%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

81%

Michelin
Alpin 5

79%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

78%

Remmen op nat wegdek

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 95%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 87%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 80%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 76%

5. Michelin Alpin 5 74%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 94%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 90%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 86%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 79%

5. Michelin Alpin 5 77%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 93%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 91%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 92%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 82%

5. Michelin Alpin 5 76%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 93%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 84%

3. Michelin Alpin 5 83%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 78%

5. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 74%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 94%

2. Michelin Alpin 5 87%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 86%

4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 74%

5. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 74%

Prestaties op nat wegdek

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 84%

2. Michelin Alpin 5 79%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 77%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 0%

5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 0%

Remmen op nat wegdek volgens eu-label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 A

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 B

3. Michelin Alpin 5 B

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P B

5. Continental WinterContact TS 870 B

Droog

(Algemene score)

Michelin
Alpin 5

86%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

86%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

83%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

78%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

78%

Droogremmen

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 86%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 81%

3. Michelin Alpin 5 80%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 74%

5. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 72%

Droog rijgedrag

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 100%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 91%

3. Michelin Alpin 5 89%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 83%

5. Continental WinterContact TS 870 78%

Prestaties op droog wegdek

1. Michelin Alpin 5 86%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 77%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 59%

4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 56%

5. Continental WinterContact TS 870 0%

Droge behandeling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 91%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 89%

3. Michelin Alpin 5 87%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 87%

5. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 82%

Sneeuw

(Algemene score)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

90%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

80%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

77%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

74%

Michelin
Alpin 5

69%

Tractie op sneeuw

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 87%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 82%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 79%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 75%

5. Michelin Alpin 5 68%

Remmen op sneeuw

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 90%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 86%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 79%

4. Michelin Alpin 5 76%

5. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 77%

Sneeuw in bochten

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 94%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 81%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 79%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 77%

5. Michelin Alpin 5 71%

Sneeuwverwerking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 90%

2. Michelin Alpin 5 71%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 72%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 65%

5. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 62%

Prestaties op sneeuw

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 85%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 83%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 74%

4. Michelin Alpin 5 59%

5. Continental WinterContact TS 870 0%

Kosten

(Algemene score)

Michelin
Alpin 5

84%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

80%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

75%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

66%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

59%

Kilometrage

1. Michelin Alpin 5 96%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 83%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 64%

4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 56%

5. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 37%

Prijs/waarde

1. Michelin Alpin 5 97%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 68%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 68%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 60%

5. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 49%

Rolweerstand

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 92%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 89%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 87%

4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 75%

5. Michelin Alpin 5 68%

Brandstofverbruik volgens eu-label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P C

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 C

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 C

4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 C

5. Michelin Alpin 5 E

Soelaas

(Algemene score)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

90%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

82%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

80%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

79%

Michelin
Alpin 5

72%

Buitengeluid

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 86%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 81%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 80%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 79%

5. Michelin Alpin 5 63%

Inwendig geluid

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 98%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 85%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 84%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 80%

5. Michelin Alpin 5 67%

Soelaas

1. Michelin Alpin 5 87%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 85%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 82%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 79%

5. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 73%

Buitengeluid volgens eu-label

1. Michelin Alpin 5 ?

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 ?

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 ?

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P ?

5. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 ?

Ijs

(Algemene score)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

85%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

80%

Michelin
Alpin 5

79%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

0%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

0%

Remmen op ijs

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 85%

2. Michelin Alpin 5 81%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 79%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P -27%

5. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 -27%

Zijdelingse geleiding van het ijs

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 82%

2. Michelin Alpin 5 78%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 0%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 0%

5. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 0%

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Maken

Model

Vergelijking: Michelin Alpin 5 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

De zomer

Ranglijstjes

Testen

Merken

Ranglijstjes

Testen

Merken

Winter

Ranglijstjes

Testen

Merken

Ranglijstjes

Testen

Merken

Allround

Ranglijstjes

Testen

Merken

Ranglijstjes

Testen

Merken