12 shops, 123 162 producten

Vergelijking: Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Semperit Speed-Grip 5

Inhoudstafel:

Samenvatting
Nat
Droog
Sneeuw
Ijs
Kosten
Wederzijdse tests
Aanschaf %

#	Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 /0%	GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 /95%	Continental WinterContact TS 870 /99%	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /81%	Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ /87%	Semperit Speed-Grip 5 /78%

Afmetingen	R13 - R17	R14 - R22	R14 - R18	R14 - R19	R0 - R21	R14 - R21
Prijs	Stel dimensie in om prijzen te zien	Stel dimensie in om prijzen te zien	Stel dimensie in om prijzen te zien	Stel dimensie in om prijzen te zien	Stel dimensie in om prijzen te zien	Stel dimensie in om prijzen te zien
Verwijderen	Verwijderen uit vergelijking	Verwijderen uit vergelijking	Verwijderen uit vergelijking	Verwijderen uit vergelijking	Verwijderen uit vergelijking	Verwijderen uit vergelijking

Segment

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Premie

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 Premie

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Premie

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Bovenmidden

5. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Bovenmidden

6. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 Goedkoop

Aantal beschikbare maten

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 265

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 97

3. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 93

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

5. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 88

6. Continental WinterContact TS 870 80

Aantal tests

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 24x

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 23x

3. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 21x

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 17x

5. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 12x

6. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 3x

Beste positie in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 1.

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 1.

4. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 2.

5. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 3.

6. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 4.

Slechtste positie in de test

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 5.

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 8.

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 9.

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

5. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 19.

6. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 20.

Gemiddelde positie in tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 1.71

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 2.67

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 4.33

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.65

5. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 7.1

6. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 9.33

Jaar van de laatste test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2025

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 2025

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 2025

4. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 2025

5. Continental WinterContact TS 870 2024

6. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 2020

Beste beoordeling in test

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Sterk aanbevolen

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 Testwinnaar

3. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 Voorbeeldig

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Zeer goed

5. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Zeer goed

6. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Fijn

Slechtste beoordeling in de test

1. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 Fijn

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Fijn

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Fijn

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Fijn

5. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 Geadviseerd

6. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Voldoende

Droog

(Algemene score)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

88%

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

83%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

78%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

78%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

72%

Semperit
Speed-Grip 5

69%

Droogremmen

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 85%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 86%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 84%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 72%

5. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 72%

6. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 49%

Droge behandeling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 91%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 87%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 82%

4. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 76%

5. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 72%

6. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 67%

Prestaties op droog wegdek

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 83%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 78%

3. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 69%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

5. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 56%

6. Continental WinterContact TS 870 0%

Droog rijgedrag

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 100%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 83%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 78%

4. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 76%

5. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

6. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

Droge rijstrook wisselen

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 95%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 77%

3. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 70%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 65%

5. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 0%

6. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

Droge stuurrespons

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 95%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 90%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 79%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 78%

5. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 0%

6. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

Sneeuw

(Algemene score)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

93%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

91%

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

88%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

81%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

74%

Semperit
Speed-Grip 5

67%

Tractie op sneeuw

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 88%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 87%

4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 79%

5. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 76%

6. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 60%

Remmen op sneeuw

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 93%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 90%

3. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 87%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 80%

5. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 77%

6. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 66%

Sneeuwverwerking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 90%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 91%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 90%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 86%

5. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 72%

6. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 62%

Sneeuw in bochten

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 94%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 89%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 78%

4. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 78%

5. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 79%

6. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 73%

Prestaties op sneeuw

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 93%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 88%

3. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 78%

4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 74%

5. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 63%

6. Continental WinterContact TS 870 0%

Nat

(Algemene score)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

88%

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

84%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

81%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

78%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

69%

Semperit
Speed-Grip 5

66%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 94%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 86%

3. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 84%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 81%

5. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 65%

6. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 63%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 93%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 88%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 76%

4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 74%

5. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 69%

6. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 66%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 94%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 91%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 86%

4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 74%

5. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 72%

6. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 64%

Remmen op nat wegdek

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 87%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 83%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 84%

4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 80%

5. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 67%

6. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 58%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 91%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 92%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 86%

4. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 86%

5. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

6. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 68%

Prestaties op nat wegdek

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 84%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 82%

3. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 79%

4. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 73%

5. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 64%

6. Continental WinterContact TS 870 0%

Remmen op nat wegdek volgens eu-label

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 B

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ B

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 B

5. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 C

6. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 C

Soelaas

(Algemene score)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

90%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

83%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80%

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

78%

Semperit
Speed-Grip 5

71%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

70%

Buitengeluid

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 86%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 83%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 80%

4. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 76%

5. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 72%

6. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 69%

Inwendig geluid

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 98%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 84%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 81%

4. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 79%

5. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 67%

6. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

Soelaas

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 85%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 82%

3. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 78%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 78%

5. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 73%

6. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 68%

Buitengeluid volgens eu-label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 ?

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 ?

3. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 ?

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

5. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 ?

6. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ ?

Kosten

(Algemene score)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

80%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

77%

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

74%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

74%

Semperit
Speed-Grip 5

69%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

66%

Rolweerstand

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 89%

2. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 83%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 75%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

5. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 69%

6. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 60%

Kilometrage

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 83%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 77%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 69%

5. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 56%

6. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 45%

Prijs/waarde

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 84%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 83%

3. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 79%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 68%

5. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 68%

6. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 68%

Brandstofverbruik volgens eu-label

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ C

2. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 C

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 C

4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 C

5. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 E

6. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

Ijs

(Algemene score)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

85%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80%

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

79%

Semperit
Speed-Grip 5

28%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

0%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

0%

Remmen op ijs

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 85%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 80%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 80%

4. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 28%

5. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 -27%

6. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Maken

Model

Vergelijking: Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Semperit Speed-Grip 5

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

De zomer

Ranglijstjes

Testen

Merken

Ranglijstjes

Testen

Merken

Winter

Ranglijstjes

Testen

Merken

Ranglijstjes

Testen

Merken

Allround

Ranglijstjes

Testen

Merken

Ranglijstjes

Testen

Merken