12 shops, 123 162 producten

Vergelijking: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Inhoudstafel:

Samenvatting
Nat
Droog
Sneeuw
Ijs
Kosten
Wederzijdse tests
Aanschaf %

#	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 /0%	GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 /95%	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /81%

Afmetingen	R14 - R21	R14 - R22	R14 - R19
Prijs	Stel dimensie in om prijzen te zien	Stel dimensie in om prijzen te zien	Stel dimensie in om prijzen te zien
Verwijderen	Verwijderen uit vergelijking	Verwijderen uit vergelijking	Verwijderen uit vergelijking

Segment

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premie

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 Premie

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Bovenmidden

Aantal beschikbare maten

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 265

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 132

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

Aantal tests

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 24x

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 23x

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 15x

Beste positie in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 1.

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 4.

Slechtste positie in de test

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 9.

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 18.

Gemiddelde positie in tests

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 2.67

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.65

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 7.87

Jaar van de laatste test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2025

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 2025

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 2018

Beste beoordeling in test

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 Testwinnaar

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Zeer goed

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Fijn

Slechtste beoordeling in de test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Fijn

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Fijn

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 Geadviseerd

Nat

(Algemene score)

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

81%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

78%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

69%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 91%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 80%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 80%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 76%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 74%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 87%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 86%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 74%

Remmen op nat wegdek

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 80%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 67%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 62%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 86%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 67%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 65%

Natte prestaties

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 84%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 81%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 64%

Remmen op nat wegdek volgens eu-label

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 B

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 B

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

Droog

(Algemene score)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

83%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

79%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

72%

Droogremmen

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 80%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 72%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 72%

Droge prestaties

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 88%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 56%

Droge behandeling

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 82%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 77%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 67%

Sneeuw

(Algemene score)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

93%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

78%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

73%

Remmen op sneeuw

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 93%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 88%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 77%

Sneeuwverwerking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 90%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 77%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 62%

Tractie op sneeuw

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 78%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 79%

Kosten

(Algemene score)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

77%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

76%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

66%

Prijs/waarde

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 70%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 68%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 68%

Rolweerstand

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 78%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 75%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

Kilometrage

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 76%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 56%

Brandstofverbruik volgens eu-label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 C

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 C

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

Soelaas

(Algemene score)

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

82%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

82%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

54%

Buitengeluid

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 83%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 80%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 75%

Inwendig geluid

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 84%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 81%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 33%

Buitengeluid volgens eu-label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 71 dB

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 ?

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

Ijs

(Algemene score)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

80%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

0%

Remmen op ijs

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 82%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 80%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 -27%

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Maken

Model

Vergelijking: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

De zomer

Ranglijstjes

Testen

Merken

Ranglijstjes

Testen

Merken

Winter

Ranglijstjes

Testen

Merken

Ranglijstjes

Testen

Merken

Allround

Ranglijstjes

Testen

Merken

Ranglijstjes

Testen

Merken