12 shops, 123 162 producten

Vergelijking: Michelin Alpin 5 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870

Inhoudstafel:

Samenvatting
Nat
Droog
Sneeuw
Ijs
Kosten
Wederzijdse tests
Aanschaf %

#	Michelin Alpin 5 /0%	Continental WinterContact TS 870 P /93%	GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 /95%	Continental WinterContact TS 870 /99%

Afmetingen	R15 - R21	R16 - R22	R14 - R22	R14 - R18
Prijs	Stel dimensie in om prijzen te zien	Stel dimensie in om prijzen te zien	Stel dimensie in om prijzen te zien	Stel dimensie in om prijzen te zien
Verwijderen	Verwijderen uit vergelijking	Verwijderen uit vergelijking	Verwijderen uit vergelijking	Verwijderen uit vergelijking

Segment

1. Michelin Alpin 5 Premie

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Premie

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 Premie

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Premie

Aantal beschikbare maten

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 265

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 178

3. Michelin Alpin 5 91

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 80

Aantal tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 29x

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 24x

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 17x

4. Michelin Alpin 5 17x

Beste positie in test

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 1.

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 1.

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 1.

4. Michelin Alpin 5 2.

Slechtste positie in de test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 8.

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 9.

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 13.

4. Michelin Alpin 5 17.

Gemiddelde positie in tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 1.71

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 2.67

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 3.66

4. Michelin Alpin 5 5.88

Jaar van de laatste test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 2025

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 2025

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 2024

4. Michelin Alpin 5 2018

Beste beoordeling in test

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 Testwinnaar

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Testwinnaar

3. Michelin Alpin 5 Zeer goed

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Zeer goed

Slechtste beoordeling in de test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Fijn

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Fijn

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 Geadviseerd

4. Michelin Alpin 5 Geadviseerd

Nat

(Algemene score)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

92%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

81%

Michelin
Alpin 5

79%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

78%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 93%

2. Michelin Alpin 5 83%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 78%

4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 74%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 94%

2. Michelin Alpin 5 87%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 74%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 74%

Remmen op nat wegdek

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 87%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 80%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 76%

4. Michelin Alpin 5 74%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 94%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 86%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 79%

4. Michelin Alpin 5 77%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 91%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 92%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 82%

4. Michelin Alpin 5 76%

Natte prestaties

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 84%

2. Michelin Alpin 5 79%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 77%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 0%

Remmen op nat wegdek volgens eu-label

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 B

2. Michelin Alpin 5 B

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P B

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 B

Droog

(Algemene score)

Michelin
Alpin 5

86%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

86%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

78%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

78%

Droge prestaties

1. Michelin Alpin 5 86%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 59%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 56%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 0%

Droogremmen

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 86%

2. Michelin Alpin 5 80%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 74%

4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 72%

Droog rijgedrag

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 100%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 91%

3. Michelin Alpin 5 89%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 78%

Droge behandeling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 91%

2. Michelin Alpin 5 87%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 87%

4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 82%

Sneeuw

(Algemene score)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

90%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

77%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

74%

Michelin
Alpin 5

69%

Tractie op sneeuw

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 87%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 79%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 75%

4. Michelin Alpin 5 68%

Sneeuwprestaties

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 85%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 74%

3. Michelin Alpin 5 59%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 0%

Remmen op sneeuw

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 90%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 79%

3. Michelin Alpin 5 76%

4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 77%

Sneeuw in bochten

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 94%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 81%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 79%

4. Michelin Alpin 5 71%

Sneeuwverwerking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 90%

2. Michelin Alpin 5 71%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 65%

4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 62%

Kosten

(Algemene score)

Michelin
Alpin 5

84%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

80%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

66%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

59%

Kilometrage

1. Michelin Alpin 5 96%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 83%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 56%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 37%

Rolweerstand

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 92%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 89%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 75%

4. Michelin Alpin 5 68%

Prijs/waarde

1. Michelin Alpin 5 97%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 68%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 68%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 49%

Brandstofverbruik volgens eu-label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 C

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 C

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P C

4. Michelin Alpin 5 E

Soelaas

(Algemene score)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

90%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

80%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

79%

Michelin
Alpin 5

72%

Buitengeluid

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 86%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 81%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 80%

4. Michelin Alpin 5 63%

Inwendig geluid

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 98%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 84%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 80%

4. Michelin Alpin 5 67%

Soelaas

1. Michelin Alpin 5 87%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 85%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 79%

4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 73%

Buitengeluid volgens eu-label

1. Michelin Alpin 5 ?

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 ?

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P ?

4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 ?

Ijs

(Algemene score)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

85%

Michelin
Alpin 5

79%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

0%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

0%

Remmen op ijs

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 85%

2. Michelin Alpin 5 81%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P -27%

4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 -27%

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Maken

Model

Vergelijking: Michelin Alpin 5 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

De zomer

Ranglijstjes

Testen

Merken

Ranglijstjes

Testen

Merken

Winter

Ranglijstjes

Testen

Merken

Ranglijstjes

Testen

Merken

Allround

Ranglijstjes

Testen

Merken

Ranglijstjes

Testen

Merken