12 shops, 123 162 producten

Vergelijking: Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. General Tire Grabber GT Plus vs. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

Inhoudstafel:

Samenvatting
Nat
Droog
Kosten
Wederzijdse tests
Aanschaf %

#	Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV /92%	Continental PremiumContact 6 /76%	Firestone Roadhawk 2 /74%	Firestone Roadhawk /57%	General Tire Grabber GT Plus /43%	Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport /37%	GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV /0%

Afmetingen	R16 - R22	R15 - R22	R16 - R22	R15 - R21	R15 - R23	R16 - R21	R16 - R22
Prijs	Stel dimensie in om prijzen te zien	Stel dimensie in om prijzen te zien	Stel dimensie in om prijzen te zien	Stel dimensie in om prijzen te zien	Stel dimensie in om prijzen te zien	Stel dimensie in om prijzen te zien	Stel dimensie in om prijzen te zien
Verwijderen	Verwijderen uit vergelijking	Verwijderen uit vergelijking	Verwijderen uit vergelijking	Verwijderen uit vergelijking	Verwijderen uit vergelijking	Verwijderen uit vergelijking	Verwijderen uit vergelijking

Segment

1. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV Premie

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premie

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2 Bovenmidden

4. Firestone Roadhawk Bovenmidden

5. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport Bovenmidden

6. General Tire Grabber GT Plus Goedkoop

7. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV ?

Aantal beschikbare maten

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 296

2. Firestone Roadhawk 161

3. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 146

4. Firestone Roadhawk 2 136

5. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 123

6. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 64

7. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 58

Aantal tests

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 36x

2. Firestone Roadhawk 21x

3. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 5x

4. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 5x

5. Firestone Roadhawk 2 3x

6. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 2x

7. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV ?

Beste positie in test

1. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 9.

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 5.

3. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 2.

4. Firestone Roadhawk 2.

5. Continental PremiumContact 6 1.

6. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 1.

7. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV ?

Slechtste positie in de test

1. Firestone Roadhawk 31.

2. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 29.

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 9.

4. Continental PremiumContact 6 8.

5. Firestone Roadhawk 2 6.

6. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 4.

7. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV ?

Gemiddelde positie in tests

1. Firestone Roadhawk 11.9

2. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 11.6

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 9

4. Firestone Roadhawk 2 5.67

5. Continental PremiumContact 6 3.06

6. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 2.2

7. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV ?

Jaar van de laatste test

1. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 2026

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 2025

3. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 2025

4. Continental PremiumContact 6 2023

5. Firestone Roadhawk 2023

6. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 2023

7. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 2018

Beste beoordeling in test

1. Firestone Roadhawk 2 Sterk aanbevolen

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 Voorbeeldig

3. Firestone Roadhawk Voorbeeldig

4. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV Voorbeeldig

5. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport Fijn

6. General Tire Grabber GT Plus Voldoende

7. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV ?

Slechtste beoordeling in de test

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Geadviseerd

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus Voldoende

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2 Voldoende

4. Firestone Roadhawk Voorwaardelijk aanbevolen

5. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport Voorwaardelijk aanbevolen

6. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV ?

7. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV ?

Nat

(Algemene score)

Firestone
Roadhawk 2

87%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip SUV

84%

Continental
PremiumContact 6

82%

Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Firestone
Roadhawk

74%

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus

67%

Cooper
Zeon 4XS Sport

66%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

1. Firestone Roadhawk 2 88%

2. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 82%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 72%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 71%

5. Continental PremiumContact 6 68%

6. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 64%

7. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 55%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

1. Firestone Roadhawk 2 95%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 87%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 79%

4. Continental PremiumContact 6 79%

5. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 78%

6. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 68%

7. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 64%

Remmen op nat wegdek

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 91%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 89%

3. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 85%

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 80%

5. Firestone Roadhawk 2 78%

6. Firestone Roadhawk 67%

7. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 63%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

1. Firestone Roadhawk 2 88%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 89%

3. Continental PremiumContact 6 87%

4. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 86%

5. Firestone Roadhawk 74%

6. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 72%

7. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 61%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 87%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 86%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2 84%

4. Firestone Roadhawk 78%

5. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 79%

6. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 76%

7. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 62%

Remmen op nat wegdek volgens eu-label

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 A

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 A

3. Firestone Roadhawk A

4. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV A

5. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport A

6. General Tire Grabber GT Plus A

7. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV B

Offroad

(Algemene score)

Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Continental
PremiumContact 6

76%

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus

74%

Cooper
Zeon 4XS Sport

69%

Firestone
Roadhawk 2

0%

Firestone
Roadhawk

0%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip SUV

0%

Tractie op het gras

1. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 83%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 71%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 64%

4. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 54%

5. Firestone Roadhawk 2 0%

6. Firestone Roadhawk 0%

7. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 0%

Tractie van grind

1. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 87%

2. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 83%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 80%

4. Continental PremiumContact 6 65%

5. Firestone Roadhawk 2 0%

6. Firestone Roadhawk 0%

7. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 0%

Behandeling op grind

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 93%

2. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 76%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 70%

4. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 70%

5. Firestone Roadhawk 2 0%

6. Firestone Roadhawk 0%

7. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 0%

Moddertractie

1. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 76%

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 73%

3. Continental PremiumContact 6 66%

4. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 63%

5. Firestone Roadhawk 2 0%

6. Firestone Roadhawk 0%

7. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 0%

Zandtractie

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 86%

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 83%

3. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 80%

4. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 71%

5. Firestone Roadhawk 2 0%

6. Firestone Roadhawk 0%

7. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 0%

Soelaas

(Algemene score)

Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV

89%

Continental
PremiumContact 6

79%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip SUV

78%

Cooper
Zeon 4XS Sport

70%

Firestone
Roadhawk

69%

Firestone
Roadhawk 2

68%

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus

63%

Buitengeluid

1. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 90%

2. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 73%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 72%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 70%

5. Firestone Roadhawk 2 66%

6. Continental PremiumContact 6 66%

7. Firestone Roadhawk 62%

Soelaas

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 100%

2. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 83%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 72%

4. Firestone Roadhawk 2 71%

5. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 60%

6. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 60%

7. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 0%

Inwendig geluid

1. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 100%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 86%

3. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 81%

4. Continental PremiumContact 6 80%

5. Firestone Roadhawk 77%

6. Firestone Roadhawk 2 0%

7. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 0%

Buitengeluid volgens eu-label

1. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 69 dB

2. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV ?

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV ?

4. Continental PremiumContact 6 ?

5. Firestone Roadhawk ?

6. Firestone Roadhawk 2 ?

7. General Tire Grabber GT Plus ?

Kosten

(Algemene score)

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus

88%

Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV

87%

Continental
PremiumContact 6

80%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip SUV

79%

Firestone
Roadhawk

66%

Cooper
Zeon 4XS Sport

64%

Firestone
Roadhawk 2

61%

Rolweerstand

1. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 88%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 88%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2 85%

4. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 77%

5. Continental PremiumContact 6 75%

6. Firestone Roadhawk 74%

7. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 69%

Kilometrage

1. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 96%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 85%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 70%

4. Firestone Roadhawk 64%

5. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 60%

6. Firestone Roadhawk 2 38%

7. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 0%

Prijs/waarde

1. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 87%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 81%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2 60%

4. Firestone Roadhawk 61%

5. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 0%

6. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 0%

7. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 0%

Brandstofverbruik volgens eu-label

1. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV B

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 B

3. Continental PremiumContact 6 C

4. Firestone Roadhawk C

5. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV C

6. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport C

7. General Tire Grabber GT Plus C

Droog

(Algemene score)

GoodYear
Efficientgrip SUV

93%

Continental
PremiumContact 6

92%

Firestone
Roadhawk

85%

Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Cooper
Zeon 4XS Sport

80%

Firestone
Roadhawk 2

79%

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus

64%

Droogremmen

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 92%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 92%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 83%

4. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 82%

5. Firestone Roadhawk 2 81%

6. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 77%

7. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 74%

Droge behandeling

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 93%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 92%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 88%

4. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 83%

5. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 84%

6. Firestone Roadhawk 2 77%

7. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 53%

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Maken

Model

Gezamenlijke testen beschikbaar

Deze banden zijn samen getest in 1 test(s). Klik om gedetailleerde onderlinge resultaten te bekijken.

Wederzijdse tests

Autobild Zomerbandentest 2021 215/60 R17

Naam	Nat	Droog	Offroad
Beste waarden in test	2+	2+	2+
GoodYear Efficientgrip 2 SUV Beoordeling: Voorbeeldig	2+	2+	2+
Continental PremiumContact 6 Beoordeling: Fijn	2+	2+	2-
Toon testgegevens

Vergelijking: Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. General Tire Grabber GT Plus vs. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Gezamenlijke testen beschikbaar

Wederzijdse tests

De zomer

Ranglijstjes

Testen

Merken

Ranglijstjes

Testen

Merken

Winter

Ranglijstjes

Testen

Merken

Ranglijstjes

Testen

Merken

Allround

Ranglijstjes

Testen

Merken

Ranglijstjes

Testen

Merken