Vergelijking: Goodride Solmax 1 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Yokohama BluEarth-XT

1. Hankook ION Evo Premie

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 Premie

3. Falken e.Ziex Bovenmidden

4. Yokohama BluEarth-XT Bovenmidden

5. Goodride Solmax 1 Goedkoop

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 66

2. Hankook ION Evo 64

3. Falken e.Ziex 34

4. Goodride Solmax 1 2

5. Yokohama BluEarth-XT 0

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 23x

2. Falken e.Ziex 3x

3. Goodride Solmax 1 1x

4. Hankook ION Evo 1x

5. Yokohama BluEarth-XT 1x

1. Hankook ION Evo 1.

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 1.

3. Falken e.Ziex 2.

4. Yokohama BluEarth-XT 7.

5. Goodride Solmax 1 8.

1. Hankook ION Evo 1.

2. Falken e.Ziex 5.

3. Yokohama BluEarth-XT 7.

4. Goodride Solmax 1 8.

5. Continental PremiumContact 7 8.

1. Hankook ION Evo 1

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 2.35

3. Falken e.Ziex 3.67

4. Yokohama BluEarth-XT 7

5. Goodride Solmax 1 8

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 2026

2. Falken e.Ziex 2025

3. Goodride Solmax 1 2025

4. Hankook ION Evo 2025

5. Yokohama BluEarth-XT 2025

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 Testwinnaar

2. Hankook ION Evo Voorbeeldig

3. Falken e.Ziex Zeer goed

4. Yokohama BluEarth-XT Voldoende

5. Goodride Solmax 1 Voorwaardelijk aanbevolen

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 Fijn

2. Falken e.Ziex Fijn

3. Yokohama BluEarth-XT Voldoende

4. Goodride Solmax 1 Voorwaardelijk aanbevolen

5. Hankook ION Evo ?

Hankook
ION Evo

89%

Continental
PremiumContact 7

85%

Falken
e.Ziex

72%

Yokohama
BluEarth-XT

61%

Goodride
Solmax 1

53%

1. Hankook ION Evo 87%

2. Goodride Solmax 1 78%

3. Continental PremiumContact 7 76%

4. Falken e.Ziex 61%

5. Yokohama BluEarth-XT 51%

1. Hankook ION Evo 97%

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 94%

3. Falken e.Ziex 87%

4. Yokohama BluEarth-XT 62%

5. Goodride Solmax 1 35%

1. Hankook ION Evo 77%

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 75%

3. Falken e.Ziex 68%

4. Goodride Solmax 1 53%

5. Yokohama BluEarth-XT 38%

1. Hankook ION Evo 92%

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 92%

3. Falken e.Ziex 77%

4. Yokohama BluEarth-XT 77%

5. Goodride Solmax 1 46%

1. Hankook ION Evo 92%

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 90%

3. Yokohama BluEarth-XT 75%

4. Falken e.Ziex 69%

5. Goodride Solmax 1 51%

1. Hankook ION Evo A

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 A

3. Yokohama BluEarth-XT ?

4. Falken e.Ziex ?

5. Goodride Solmax 1 ?

Continental
PremiumContact 7

78%

Falken
e.Ziex

72%

Hankook
ION Evo

70%

Goodride
Solmax 1

67%

Yokohama
BluEarth-XT

52%

1. Falken e.Ziex 95%

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 75%

3. Hankook ION Evo 69%

4. Goodride Solmax 1 60%

5. Yokohama BluEarth-XT 51%

1. Hankook ION Evo 82%

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 81%

3. Falken e.Ziex 60%

4. Goodride Solmax 1 45%

5. Yokohama BluEarth-XT 45%

1. Goodride Solmax 1 96%

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 77%

3. Hankook ION Evo 60%

4. Falken e.Ziex 60%

5. Yokohama BluEarth-XT 60%

1. Hankook ION Evo A

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 C

3. Goodride Solmax 1 ?

4. Falken e.Ziex ?

5. Yokohama BluEarth-XT ?

Yokohama
BluEarth-XT

82%

Falken
e.Ziex

78%

Goodride
Solmax 1

77%

Hankook
ION Evo

72%

Continental
PremiumContact 7

72%

1. Goodride Solmax 1 78%

2. Hankook ION Evo 78%

3. Falken e.Ziex 78%

4. Continental PremiumContact 7 75%

5. Yokohama BluEarth-XT 69%

1. Yokohama BluEarth-XT 95%

2. Falken e.Ziex 78%

3. Goodride Solmax 1 76%

4. Continental PremiumContact 7 69%

5. Hankook ION Evo 66%

1. Yokohama BluEarth-XT ?

2. Falken e.Ziex ?

3. Goodride Solmax 1 ?

4. Continental PremiumContact 7 ?

5. Hankook ION Evo ?

Hankook
ION Evo

92%

Continental
PremiumContact 7

88%

Falken
e.Ziex

84%

Yokohama
BluEarth-XT

66%

Goodride
Solmax 1

54%

1. Hankook ION Evo 91%

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 90%

3. Falken e.Ziex 88%

4. Yokohama BluEarth-XT 64%

5. Goodride Solmax 1 56%

1. Hankook ION Evo 92%

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 85%

3. Falken e.Ziex 81%

4. Yokohama BluEarth-XT 67%

5. Goodride Solmax 1 51%