12 shops, 123 162 producten

Vergelijking: Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. General Tire Grabber GT Plus vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

Inhoudstafel:

Samenvatting
Nat
Droog
Kosten
Wederzijdse tests
Aanschaf %

#	Continental PremiumContact 6 /76%	Firestone Roadhawk 2 /80%	Firestone Roadhawk /57%	General Tire Grabber GT Plus /43%	GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV /0%

Afmetingen	R15 - R22	R16 - R22	R15 - R21	R15 - R23	R16 - R22
Prijs	Stel dimensie in om prijzen te zien	Stel dimensie in om prijzen te zien	Stel dimensie in om prijzen te zien	Stel dimensie in om prijzen te zien	Stel dimensie in om prijzen te zien
Verwijderen	Verwijderen uit vergelijking	Verwijderen uit vergelijking	Verwijderen uit vergelijking	Verwijderen uit vergelijking	Verwijderen uit vergelijking

Segment

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premie

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 Bovenmidden

3. Firestone Roadhawk Bovenmidden

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus Goedkoop

5. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV ?

Aantal beschikbare maten

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 296

2. Firestone Roadhawk 161

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2 136

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 123

5. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 64

Aantal tests

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 36x

2. Firestone Roadhawk 21x

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2 6x

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 2x

5. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV ?

Beste positie in test

1. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 9.

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 3.

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2.

4. Continental PremiumContact 6 1.

5. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV ?

Slechtste positie in de test

1. Firestone Roadhawk 31.

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 9.

3. Continental PremiumContact 6 8.

4. Firestone Roadhawk 2 6.

5. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV ?

Gemiddelde positie in tests

1. Firestone Roadhawk 11.9

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 9

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2 4.67

4. Continental PremiumContact 6 3.06

5. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV ?

Jaar van de laatste test

1. Firestone Roadhawk 2 2026

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 2023

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2023

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 2023

5. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 2018

Beste beoordeling in test

1. Firestone Roadhawk 2 Sterk aanbevolen

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 Voorbeeldig

3. Firestone Roadhawk Voorbeeldig

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus Voldoende

5. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV ?

Slechtste beoordeling in de test

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Geadviseerd

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 Voldoende

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus Voldoende

4. Firestone Roadhawk Voorwaardelijk aanbevolen

5. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV ?

Nat

(Algemene score)

Continental
PremiumContact 6

83%

Firestone
Roadhawk 2

83%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip SUV

80%

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus

67%

Firestone
Roadhawk

66%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

1. Firestone Roadhawk 2 95%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 87%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 79%

4. Continental PremiumContact 6 79%

5. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 68%

Remmen op nat wegdek

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 91%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 89%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 80%

4. Firestone Roadhawk 2 78%

5. Firestone Roadhawk 67%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

1. Firestone Roadhawk 2 88%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 72%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 71%

4. Continental PremiumContact 6 68%

5. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 64%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

1. Firestone Roadhawk 2 88%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 89%

3. Continental PremiumContact 6 87%

4. Firestone Roadhawk 74%

5. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 61%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 87%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 86%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2 84%

4. Firestone Roadhawk 78%

5. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 62%

Natte zijgeleiding

1. Firestone Roadhawk 92%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 74%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 0%

4. Firestone Roadhawk 2 0%

5. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 0%

Remmen op nat wegdek volgens eu-label

1. Firestone Roadhawk A

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 A

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2 A

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus A

5. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV B

Droog

(Algemene score)

GoodYear
Efficientgrip SUV

89%

Continental
PremiumContact 6

88%

Firestone
Roadhawk

81%

Firestone
Roadhawk 2

74%

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus

64%

Droogremmen

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 92%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 92%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 83%

4. Firestone Roadhawk 2 81%

5. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 74%

Droge behandeling

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 93%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 92%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 88%

4. Firestone Roadhawk 2 77%

5. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 53%

Droog rijgedrag

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 84%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 81%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 75%

4. Firestone Roadhawk 2 0%

5. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 0%

Droge rijstrook wisselen

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 95%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 93%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 0%

4. Firestone Roadhawk 0%

5. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 0%

Droge stuurrespons

1. Firestone Roadhawk 100%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 91%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2 0%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 0%

5. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 0%

Soelaas

(Algemene score)

GoodYear
Efficientgrip SUV

78%

Continental
PremiumContact 6

77%

Firestone
Roadhawk 2

77%

Firestone
Roadhawk

70%

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus

63%

Buitengeluid

1. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 72%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 70%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2 66%

4. Continental PremiumContact 6 66%

5. Firestone Roadhawk 62%

Soelaas

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 100%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 72%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2 71%

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 60%

5. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 0%

Inwendig geluid

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 86%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 80%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 77%

4. Firestone Roadhawk 2 0%

5. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 0%

Buitengeluid volgens eu-label

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV ?

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 ?

3. Firestone Roadhawk ?

4. Firestone Roadhawk 2 ?

5. General Tire Grabber GT Plus ?

Offroad

(Algemene score)

Continental
PremiumContact 6

76%

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus

74%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip SUV

0%

Firestone
Roadhawk

0%

Firestone
Roadhawk 2

0%

Kosten

(Algemene score)

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus

88%

Continental
PremiumContact 6

81%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip SUV

78%

Firestone
Roadhawk

69%

Firestone
Roadhawk 2

61%

Rolweerstand

1. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 88%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 88%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2 85%

4. Continental PremiumContact 6 75%

5. Firestone Roadhawk 74%

Kilometrage

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 85%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 70%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 64%

4. Firestone Roadhawk 2 38%

5. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 0%

Brandstofefficiëntie

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 83%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 77%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 78%

4. Firestone Roadhawk 2 0%

5. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 0%

Prijs/waarde

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 81%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 60%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 61%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 0%

5. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 0%

Brandstofverbruik volgens eu-label

1. Firestone Roadhawk 2 B

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 C

3. Firestone Roadhawk C

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV C

5. General Tire Grabber GT Plus C

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Maken

Model

Vergelijking: Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. General Tire Grabber GT Plus vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

De zomer

Ranglijstjes

Testen

Merken

Ranglijstjes

Testen

Merken

Winter

Ranglijstjes

Testen

Merken

Ranglijstjes

Testen

Merken

Allround

Ranglijstjes

Testen

Merken

Ranglijstjes

Testen

Merken