Vergelijking: Firestone Winterhawk 4 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

Bovenmidden

Firestone

Winterhawk 4

VS

1 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

UltraGrip Performance 3

Test profile

Winterhawk 4

G-FORCE WINTER 2

Speed-Grip 5

WinterCraft WP52+

Aantal tests

19

23

12

3

Best position

#5

#1

#3

#4

Average position

10.7

6.7

9.3

4.3

Laatste test

2025

Beschikbare maten

101

107

93

97

Prestatievergelijking

Natte prestaties

67%

Firestone

Winterhawk 4

69%

BFGoodrich

G-FORCE WINTER 2

75%

Semperit

Speed-Grip 5

79%

Kumho

WinterCraft WP52+

Remmen op nat wegdek

Firestone Winterhawk 4

51%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

59%

Semperit Speed-Grip 5

67%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Firestone Winterhawk 4

75%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

59%

Semperit Speed-Grip 5

84%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

Firestone Winterhawk 4

63%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

55%

Semperit Speed-Grip 5

63%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

71%

Aquaplaning longitudinaal

Firestone Winterhawk 4

81%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

90%

Semperit Speed-Grip 5

81%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

Aquaplaning transversaal

Firestone Winterhawk 4

64%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

82%

Semperit Speed-Grip 5

82%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

73%

Droge prestaties

53%

Firestone

Winterhawk 4

69%

BFGoodrich

G-FORCE WINTER 2

77%

Semperit

Speed-Grip 5

73%

Kumho

WinterCraft WP52+

Droogremmen

Firestone Winterhawk 4

50%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

73%

Semperit Speed-Grip 5

81%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

Droge behandeling

Firestone Winterhawk 4

56%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

64%

Semperit Speed-Grip 5

73%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

64%

Sneeuwprestaties

81%

Firestone

Winterhawk 4

96%

BFGoodrich

G-FORCE WINTER 2

64%

Semperit

Speed-Grip 5

83%

Kumho

WinterCraft WP52+

Remmen op sneeuw

Firestone Winterhawk 4

78%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

96%

Semperit Speed-Grip 5

60%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

Tractie op sneeuw

Firestone Winterhawk 4

96%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

96%

Semperit Speed-Grip 5

69%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

Sneeuwverwerking

Firestone Winterhawk 4

71%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

96%

Semperit Speed-Grip 5

55%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

96%

Bochten op sneeuw in cirkel

Firestone Winterhawk 4

79%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

96%

Semperit Speed-Grip 5

71%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

79%

Comfort & geluid

69%

Firestone

Winterhawk 4

69%

BFGoodrich

G-FORCE WINTER 2

74%

Semperit

Speed-Grip 5

74%

Kumho

WinterCraft WP52+

Exterieurgeluid

Firestone Winterhawk 4

60%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

69%

Semperit Speed-Grip 5

78%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

Rijcomfort

Firestone Winterhawk 4

78%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

69%

Semperit Speed-Grip 5

69%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

Economie

66%

Firestone

Winterhawk 4

67%

BFGoodrich

G-FORCE WINTER 2

71%

Semperit

Speed-Grip 5

71%

Kumho

WinterCraft WP52+

Rolweerstand

Firestone Winterhawk 4

81%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

73%

Semperit Speed-Grip 5

73%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

73%

Kilometrage

Firestone Winterhawk 4

51%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

60%

Semperit Speed-Grip 5

69%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

Tests gebruikt in vergelijking

Organisatie	Seizoen	Jaar	Maat
Autobild	Winter	2025	225/40 R18	Bekijk

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Bekijk algemene vergelijking

Vergelijking: Firestone Winterhawk 4 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

Winterhawk 4

G-FORCE WINTER 2

Speed-Grip 5

WinterCraft WP52+

Test profile

Prestatievergelijking

Tests gebruikt in vergelijking

Afmetingen en prijzen

Voeg toe aan vergelijking