12 Shops · 123,162+ Products

Vergelijking: Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

1 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Test profile

Falken
EuroWinter HS02 Pro
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Aantal tests
13
23
3
14
Best position
#7
#1
#4
#1
Average position
11.9
6.7
4.3
3.6
Laatste test
2025
2025
2025
2025
Beschikbare maten
78
107
97
188

Prestatievergelijking

Natte prestaties
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
66%
Falken
EuroWinter HS02 Pro
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Remmen op nat wegdek
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
59%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
59%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
67%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
75%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
59%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
67%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
79%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
55%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Aquaplaning longitudinaal
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
61%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
90%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Aquaplaning transversaal
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
56%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
82%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Droge prestaties
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
81%
Falken
EuroWinter HS02 Pro
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
73%
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
86%
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Droogremmen
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
88%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Droge behandeling
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
73%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
64%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
64%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
91%
Sneeuwprestaties
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
53%
Falken
EuroWinter HS02 Pro
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
96%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
83%
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Remmen op sneeuw
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
51%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
96%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Tractie op sneeuw
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
51%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
96%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Sneeuwverwerking
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
46%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
96%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
96%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Bochten op sneeuw in cirkel
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
63%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
96%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Comfort & geluid
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
74%
Falken
EuroWinter HS02 Pro
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
74%
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Exterieurgeluid
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Rijcomfort
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
69%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Economie
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
56%
Falken
EuroWinter HS02 Pro
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
89%
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Rolweerstand
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
42%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Kilometrage
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
69%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
60%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
96%

Tests gebruikt in vergelijking

OrganisatieSeizoenJaarMaat
AutobildAutobild
Winter
2025225/40 R18Bekijk

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Bekijk algemene vergelijking

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking