Vergelijking: Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Barum Polaris 5 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Bovenmidden

Uniroyal

MS plus 77

R13 – R19

VS

Budget

Barum

2 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

UltraGrip Performance 3

Test profile

MS plus 77

Polaris 5

Blizzak LM-005

G-FORCE WINTER 2

Aantal tests

19

13

49

23

Best position

#3

#9

#1

Average position

11.2

15.2

3.2

6.7

Laatste test

2021

2024

2025

Beschikbare maten

76

213

107

Prestatievergelijking

Gemiddeld uit 2 tests

Natte prestaties

69%

Uniroyal

MS plus 77

64%

Barum

Polaris 5

87%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

74%

BFGoodrich

G-FORCE WINTER 2

Remmen op nat wegdek

Uniroyal MS plus 77

59%

Barum Polaris 5

55%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

96%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

63%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Uniroyal MS plus 77

72%

Barum Polaris 5

68%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

84%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

76%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

Uniroyal MS plus 77

65%

Barum Polaris 5

69%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

90%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

73%

Aquaplaning longitudinaal

Uniroyal MS plus 77

73%

Barum Polaris 5

61%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

82%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

77%

Aquaplaning transversaal

Uniroyal MS plus 77

76%

Barum Polaris 5

66%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

83%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

80%

Droge prestaties

70%

Uniroyal

MS plus 77

66%

Barum

Polaris 5

77%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

64%

BFGoodrich

G-FORCE WINTER 2

Droogremmen

Uniroyal MS plus 77

68%

Barum Polaris 5

60%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

68%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

68%

Droge behandeling

Uniroyal MS plus 77

72%

Barum Polaris 5

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

85%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

60%

Sneeuwprestaties

70%

Uniroyal

MS plus 77

74%

Barum

Polaris 5

91%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

86%

BFGoodrich

G-FORCE WINTER 2

Remmen op sneeuw

Uniroyal MS plus 77

79%

Barum Polaris 5

79%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

84%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

88%

Tractie op sneeuw

Uniroyal MS plus 77

69%

Barum Polaris 5

68%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

89%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

77%

Sneeuwverwerking

Uniroyal MS plus 77

63%

Barum Polaris 5

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

94%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

90%

Bochten op sneeuw in cirkel

Uniroyal MS plus 77

67%

Barum Polaris 5

70%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

96%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

88%

Comfort & geluid

74%

Uniroyal

MS plus 77

68%

Barum

Polaris 5

80%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

78%

BFGoodrich

G-FORCE WINTER 2

Exterieurgeluid

Uniroyal MS plus 77

71%

Barum Polaris 5

75%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

84%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

84%

Rijcomfort

Uniroyal MS plus 77

76%

Barum Polaris 5

61%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

76%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

71%

Economie

72%

Uniroyal

MS plus 77

72%

Barum

Polaris 5

71%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

74%

BFGoodrich

G-FORCE WINTER 2

Rolweerstand

Uniroyal MS plus 77

79%

Barum Polaris 5

75%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

79%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

70%

Kilometrage

Uniroyal MS plus 77

64%

Barum Polaris 5

68%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

63%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

78%

Tests gebruikt in vergelijking

Organisatie	Seizoen	Jaar	Maat
Autobild	Winter	2021	205/55 R16	Bekijk
Autobild	Winter	2020	245/45 R18	Bekijk

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Bekijk algemene vergelijking

Vergelijking: Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Barum Polaris 5 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

MS plus 77

Polaris 5

Blizzak LM-005

G-FORCE WINTER 2

Test profile

Prestatievergelijking

Tests gebruikt in vergelijking

Afmetingen en prijzen

Voeg toe aan vergelijking