12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870

Testprofiel

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Aantal tests
10
49
4
17
Beste positie
#2
#1
#2
#1
Gemiddelde positie
6.0
3.2
3.3
1.7
Laatste test
2026
2024
2026
2025
Beschikbare maten
109
213
40
80

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Confidence
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Soelaas
Confidence
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Buitengeluid
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Soelaas
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
Inwendig geluid
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
98%
Droog
Confidence
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Droogremmen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Droge behandeling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Prestaties op droog wegdek
Kumho Ecsta HS52
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kosten
Confidence
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Rolweerstand
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Kilometrage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Prijs/waarde
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
60%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
68%

Tread pattern comparison

Kumho Ecsta HS52
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store