12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

Testprofiel

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Aantal tests
10
14
23
23
Beste positie
#2
#1
#1
#1
Gemiddelde positie
6.0
3.6
6.7
3.3
Laatste test
2026
2025
2025
2025
Beschikbare maten
109
194
107
176

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
76%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
86%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Prestaties op nat wegdek
Kumho Ecsta HS52
95%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
64%
Soelaas
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Buitengeluid
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Soelaas
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Inwendig geluid
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Droog
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Droogremmen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Droge behandeling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Prestaties op droog wegdek
Kumho Ecsta HS52
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
72%
Kosten
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Rolweerstand
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Kilometrage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Prijs/waarde
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
69%

Tread pattern comparison

Kumho Ecsta HS52
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store