12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Testprofiel

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Aantal tests
10
23
4
14
Beste positie
#2
#1
#2
#1
Gemiddelde positie
6.0
6.7
3.3
3.6
Laatste test
2026
2025
2026
2025
Beschikbare maten
109
107
40
194

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nat
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Prestaties op nat wegdek
Kumho Ecsta HS52
95%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Soelaas
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Buitengeluid
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Soelaas
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Inwendig geluid
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Droog
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Droogremmen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Droge behandeling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Prestaties op droog wegdek
Kumho Ecsta HS52
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
Kosten
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Rolweerstand
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Kilometrage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Prijs/waarde
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store