12 Shops · 123,162+ Products

Vergelijking: Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

Test profile

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Aantal tests
21
49
17
23
3
Best position
#2
#1
#1
#1
#4
Average position
7.1
3.2
1.7
6.7
4.3
Laatste test
2021
2024
2025
2025
2025
Beschikbare maten
88
213
80
107
97

Droog

Droog
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Droogremmen
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Droge behandeling
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Droge prestaties
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
77%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Droog rijgedrag
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Droge rijstrook wisselen
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
Droge stuurrespons
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
95%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
78%

Sneeuw

Sneeuw
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Tractie op sneeuw
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
91%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
76%
Remmen op sneeuw
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
80%
Sneeuwverwerking
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
90%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Sneeuw in bochten
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
89%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Sneeuwprestaties
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
88%
Sneeuwversnelling
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
97%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
94%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
97%

Nat

Nat
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
86%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
95%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
76%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
93%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
92%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
79%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Buitengeluid
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Inwendig geluid
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
85%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
98%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
Soelaas
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
68%

Kosten

Kosten
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
84%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
75%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
Rolweerstand
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
60%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Kilometrage
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
64%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
83%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Prijs/waarde
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
60%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
68%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
68%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Brandstofefficiëntie
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%

Ijs

Ijs
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
Remmen op ijs
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
80%
Zijdelingse geleiding van het ijs
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking