12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Testprofiel

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Aantal tests
18
10
23
14
Beste positie
#1
#2
#1
#1
Gemiddelde positie
6.1
12.2
6.7
3.6
Laatste test
2024
2024
2025
2025
Beschikbare maten
47
207
107
194

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
76%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
65%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
82%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
71%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
81%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
69%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Droog
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
77%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Droge behandeling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
70%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Droogremmen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
84%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Droge rijstrook wisselen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Droge stuurrespons
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Soelaas
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
79%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Buitengeluid
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
67%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Soelaas
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
76%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Inwendig geluid
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
88%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
73%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Rolweerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
65%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Kilometrage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
84%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Prijs/waarde
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
83%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store