12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870

Testprofiel

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Aantal tests
18
21
23
17
Beste positie
#1
#2
#1
#1
Gemiddelde positie
6.1
11.9
6.7
1.7
Laatste test
2024
2024
2025
2025
Beschikbare maten
47
165
107
80

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
86%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
Droog
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Droge behandeling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Droogremmen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Droge rijstrook wisselen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
Droge stuurrespons
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Soelaas
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Buitengeluid
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Soelaas
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
74%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
74%
Inwendig geluid
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
98%
Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Rolweerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Kilometrage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Prijs/waarde
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
68%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
68%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store