12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Testprofiel

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Aantal tests
18
23
14
28
Beste positie
#1
#1
#1
#1
Gemiddelde positie
6.1
6.7
3.6
2.3
Laatste test
2024
2025
2025
2026
Beschikbare maten
47
107
194
68

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Natte zijgeleiding
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
100%
Droog
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Droogremmen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Droge behandeling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Droge rijstrook wisselen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Droge stuurrespons
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
Soelaas
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Buitengeluid
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Soelaas
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Inwendig geluid
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Rolweerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Kilometrage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Prijs/waarde
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store