Vergelijking: Firestone Winterhawk 4 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Fulda Kristall Control HP2

Bovenmidden

Firestone

Winterhawk 4

VS

1 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

UltraGrip Performance 3

Test profile

Winterhawk 4

Blizzak LM-005

G-FORCE WINTER 2

Kristall Control HP2

Aantal tests

19

49

23

25

Best position

#5

#1

#2

Average position

10.7

3.2

6.7

12.4

Laatste test

2025

2024

2025

Beschikbare maten

101

213

107

54

Prestatievergelijking

Natte prestaties

76%

Firestone

Winterhawk 4

90%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

74%

BFGoodrich

G-FORCE WINTER 2

61%

Fulda

Kristall Control HP2

Remmen op nat wegdek

Firestone Winterhawk 4

88%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

96%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

63%

Fulda Kristall Control HP2

46%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Firestone Winterhawk 4

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

88%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

81%

Fulda Kristall Control HP2

57%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

Firestone Winterhawk 4

65%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

88%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

73%

Fulda Kristall Control HP2

50%

Aquaplaning longitudinaal

Firestone Winterhawk 4

79%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

88%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

79%

Fulda Kristall Control HP2

63%

Aquaplaning transversaal

Firestone Winterhawk 4

69%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

90%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

76%

Fulda Kristall Control HP2

90%

Droge prestaties

55%

Firestone

Winterhawk 4

76%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

59%

BFGoodrich

G-FORCE WINTER 2

55%

Fulda

Kristall Control HP2

Droogremmen

Firestone Winterhawk 4

55%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

63%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

63%

Fulda Kristall Control HP2

55%

Droge behandeling

Firestone Winterhawk 4

55%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

88%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

55%

Fulda Kristall Control HP2

55%

Sneeuwprestaties

85%

Firestone

Winterhawk 4

93%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

85%

BFGoodrich

G-FORCE WINTER 2

63%

Fulda

Kristall Control HP2

Remmen op sneeuw

Firestone Winterhawk 4

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

81%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

90%

Fulda Kristall Control HP2

81%

Tractie op sneeuw

Firestone Winterhawk 4

79%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

96%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

71%

Fulda Kristall Control HP2

79%

Sneeuwverwerking

Firestone Winterhawk 4

88%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

96%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

96%

Fulda Kristall Control HP2

42%

Bochten op sneeuw in cirkel

Firestone Winterhawk 4

92%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

100%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

84%

Fulda Kristall Control HP2

51%

Comfort & geluid

70%

Firestone

Winterhawk 4

79%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

75%

BFGoodrich

G-FORCE WINTER 2

80%

Fulda

Kristall Control HP2

Exterieurgeluid

Firestone Winterhawk 4

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

87%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

78%

Fulda Kristall Control HP2

69%

Rijcomfort

Firestone Winterhawk 4

61%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

71%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

71%

Fulda Kristall Control HP2

90%

Economie

76%

Firestone

Winterhawk 4

64%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

64%

BFGoodrich

G-FORCE WINTER 2

85%

Fulda

Kristall Control HP2

Rolweerstand

Firestone Winterhawk 4

73%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

73%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

56%

Fulda Kristall Control HP2

73%

Kilometrage

Firestone Winterhawk 4

79%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

55%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

71%

Fulda Kristall Control HP2

96%

Tests gebruikt in vergelijking

Organisatie	Seizoen	Jaar	Maat
Autobild	Winter	2021	205/55 R16	Bekijk

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Bekijk algemene vergelijking

Vergelijking: Firestone Winterhawk 4 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Fulda Kristall Control HP2

Winterhawk 4

Blizzak LM-005

G-FORCE WINTER 2

Kristall Control HP2

Test profile

Prestatievergelijking

Tests gebruikt in vergelijking

Afmetingen en prijzen

Voeg toe aan vergelijking