12 Shops · 123,162+ Products

Vergelijking: Firestone Winterhawk 3 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 860

Test profile

Firestone
Winterhawk 3
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Continental
WinterContact TS 860
Aantal tests
14
23
23
Best position
#3
#1
#1
Average position
16.0
6.7
2.3
Laatste test
2020
2025
2021
Beschikbare maten
66
107
76

Nat

Nat
Firestone Winterhawk 3
67%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
92%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Firestone Winterhawk 3
70%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
89%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Firestone Winterhawk 3
60%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
90%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Firestone Winterhawk 3
57%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
94%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Firestone Winterhawk 3
71%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
85%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Firestone Winterhawk 3
74%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
86%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
90%
Natte prestaties
Firestone Winterhawk 3
62%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
64%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
91%

Sneeuw

Sneeuw
Firestone Winterhawk 3
81%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
91%
Tractie op sneeuw
Firestone Winterhawk 3
79%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
91%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
88%
Sneeuwprestaties
Firestone Winterhawk 3
74%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
88%
Remmen op sneeuw
Firestone Winterhawk 3
85%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
90%
Sneeuwverwerking
Firestone Winterhawk 3
76%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
90%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
87%
Sneeuw in bochten
Firestone Winterhawk 3
87%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
89%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
93%

Droog

Droog
Firestone Winterhawk 3
76%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
84%
Droge prestaties
Firestone Winterhawk 3
81%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
80%
Droogremmen
Firestone Winterhawk 3
75%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
82%
Droog rijgedrag
Firestone Winterhawk 3
77%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
73%
Droge behandeling
Firestone Winterhawk 3
76%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
91%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Winterhawk 3
80%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
79%
Kilometrage
Firestone Winterhawk 3
75%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
77%
Brandstofefficiëntie
Firestone Winterhawk 3
85%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
87%
Prijs/waarde
Firestone Winterhawk 3
92%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
68%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
68%
Rolweerstand
Firestone Winterhawk 3
79%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
82%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Firestone Winterhawk 3
70%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
79%
Buitengeluid
Firestone Winterhawk 3
74%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
80%
Inwendig geluid
Firestone Winterhawk 3
68%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
77%
Soelaas
Firestone Winterhawk 3
71%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
90%

Ijs

Ijs
Firestone Winterhawk 3
83%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
80%
Remmen op ijs
Firestone Winterhawk 3
83%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
82%
Zijdelingse geleiding van het ijs
Firestone Winterhawk 3
81%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
76%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Wederzijdse tests

OrganisatieSeizoenJaarMaat
AutobildAutobild
Winter
2017225/50 R17Bekijk
AutobildAutobild
Winter
2017225/50 R17Bekijk

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking