12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870

Testprofiel

Firestone
Roadhawk
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Aantal tests
21
18
23
17
Beste positie
#2
#1
#1
#1
Gemiddelde positie
11.9
6.1
6.7
1.7
Laatste test
2024
2024
2025
2025
Beschikbare maten
165
47
107
80

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
86%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
Droog
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Droogremmen
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Droge behandeling
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Droog rijgedrag
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
78%
Droge stuurrespons
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Soelaas
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Buitengeluid
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Soelaas
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
74%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
74%
Inwendig geluid
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
98%
Kosten
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Kilometrage
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Rolweerstand
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Prijs/waarde
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
68%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
68%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store