12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Firestone Roadhawk vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Testprofiel

Firestone
Roadhawk
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Aantal tests
21
23
23
28
Beste positie
#2
#1
#1
#1
Gemiddelde positie
11.9
6.7
3.3
2.3
Laatste test
2024
2025
2025
2026
Beschikbare maten
165
107
176
68

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
76%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
86%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Droog
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Droogremmen
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Droge behandeling
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Droog rijgedrag
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
76%
Droge stuurrespons
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
Soelaas
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Buitengeluid
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Soelaas
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Inwendig geluid
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
Kosten
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Rolweerstand
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Kilometrage
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Prijs/waarde
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store