Vergelijking: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Sava Eskimo HP2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

Bovenmidden

BFGoodrich

G-FORCE WINTER 2

VS

1 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

UltraGrip Performance 3

Test profile

G-FORCE WINTER 2

Eskimo HP2

Blizzak LM-005

UltraGrip Performance+

Aantal tests

23

15

49

23

Best position

#1

#6

#1

Average position

6.7

15.5

3.2

3.3

Laatste test

2025

2024

2025

Beschikbare maten

107

28

213

176

Prestatievergelijking

Natte prestaties

87%

BFGoodrich

G-FORCE WINTER 2

70%

Sava

Eskimo HP2

91%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

94%

GoodYear

UltraGrip Performance+

Remmen op nat wegdek

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

81%

Sava Eskimo HP2

76%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

97%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

92%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

79%

Sava Eskimo HP2

63%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

95%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

95%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

84%

Sava Eskimo HP2

68%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

95%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

95%

Aquaplaning longitudinaal

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

100%

Sava Eskimo HP2

68%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

89%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Aquaplaning transversaal

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

92%

Sava Eskimo HP2

76%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

97%

Droge prestaties

77%

BFGoodrich

G-FORCE WINTER 2

72%

Sava

Eskimo HP2

91%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

86%

GoodYear

UltraGrip Performance+

Droogremmen

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

81%

Sava Eskimo HP2

71%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

87%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Droge behandeling

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

73%

Sava Eskimo HP2

73%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

95%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Sneeuwprestaties

92%

BFGoodrich

G-FORCE WINTER 2

89%

Sava

Eskimo HP2

79%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

91%

GoodYear

UltraGrip Performance+

Remmen op sneeuw

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

97%

Sava Eskimo HP2

97%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

92%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

97%

Tractie op sneeuw

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

97%

Sava Eskimo HP2

92%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

76%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

97%

Sneeuwverwerking

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

87%

Sava Eskimo HP2

87%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

76%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Bochten op sneeuw in cirkel

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

87%

Sava Eskimo HP2

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

71%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Comfort & geluid

90%

BFGoodrich

G-FORCE WINTER 2

76%

Sava

Eskimo HP2

84%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

92%

GoodYear

UltraGrip Performance+

Exterieurgeluid

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

95%

Sava Eskimo HP2

68%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

89%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Rijcomfort

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

84%

Sava Eskimo HP2

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

79%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

95%

Economie

80%

BFGoodrich

G-FORCE WINTER 2

80%

Sava

Eskimo HP2

86%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

83%

GoodYear

UltraGrip Performance+

Rolweerstand

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

81%

Sava Eskimo HP2

92%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

92%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Kilometrage

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

79%

Sava Eskimo HP2

68%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

79%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Tests gebruikt in vergelijking

Organisatie	Seizoen	Jaar	Maat
Autobild	Winter	2019	225/45 R17	Bekijk

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Bekijk algemene vergelijking

Vergelijking: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Sava Eskimo HP2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

G-FORCE WINTER 2

Eskimo HP2

Blizzak LM-005

UltraGrip Performance+

Test profile

Prestatievergelijking

Tests gebruikt in vergelijking

Afmetingen en prijzen

Voeg toe aan vergelijking