12 Shops · 123,162+ Products

Vergelijking: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Sava Eskimo HP2 vs. Barum Polaris 6 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

Test profile

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Sava
Eskimo HP2
Barum
Polaris 6
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Aantal tests
23
15
3
23
Best position
#1
#6
#2
#1
Average position
6.7
15.5
7.0
3.3
Laatste test
2025
2025
2025
2025
Beschikbare maten
107
28
98
176

Droog

Droog
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Sava Eskimo HP2
71%
Barum Polaris 6
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Droogremmen
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Sava Eskimo HP2
70%
Barum Polaris 6
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Droge behandeling
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Sava Eskimo HP2
72%
Barum Polaris 6
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Droge rijstrook wisselen
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
74%
Droge stuurrespons
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Droge prestaties
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Sava Eskimo HP2
72%
Barum Polaris 6
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
72%
Droog rijgedrag
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Sava Eskimo HP2
74%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
76%

Nat

Nat
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
Sava Eskimo HP2
63%
Barum Polaris 6
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
76%
Sava Eskimo HP2
69%
Barum Polaris 6
76%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Remmen op nat wegdek
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Sava Eskimo HP2
67%
Barum Polaris 6
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Sava Eskimo HP2
60%
Barum Polaris 6
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
86%
Sava Eskimo HP2
63%
Barum Polaris 6
74%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
Sava Eskimo HP2
59%
Barum Polaris 6
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%

Sneeuw

Sneeuw
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Sava Eskimo HP2
78%
Barum Polaris 6
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Tractie op sneeuw
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
91%
Sava Eskimo HP2
85%
Barum Polaris 6
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Remmen op sneeuw
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Sava Eskimo HP2
86%
Barum Polaris 6
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Sneeuwverwerking
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
90%
Sava Eskimo HP2
67%
Barum Polaris 6
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Sneeuw in bochten
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
89%
Sava Eskimo HP2
74%
Barum Polaris 6
63%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
88%
Sneeuwprestaties
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Sava Eskimo HP2
77%
Barum Polaris 6
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%

Soelaas

Soelaas
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
79%
Sava Eskimo HP2
72%
Barum Polaris 6
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Buitengeluid
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%
Sava Eskimo HP2
62%
Barum Polaris 6
94%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Soelaas
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
78%
Sava Eskimo HP2
83%
Barum Polaris 6
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Inwendig geluid
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
Sava Eskimo HP2
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%

Kosten

Kosten
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
75%
Sava Eskimo HP2
83%
Barum Polaris 6
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Rolweerstand
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Sava Eskimo HP2
83%
Barum Polaris 6
97%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Kilometrage
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Sava Eskimo HP2
76%
Barum Polaris 6
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Prijs/waarde
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
68%
Sava Eskimo HP2
92%
Barum Polaris 6
92%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
69%

Ijs

Ijs
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
Sava Eskimo HP2
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Remmen op ijs
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
80%
Sava Eskimo HP2
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking