12 Shops · 123,162+ Products

Vergelijking: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Firestone Winterhawk 4 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870

3 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Test profile

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Firestone
Winterhawk 4
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Aantal tests
23
19
17
Best position
#1
#5
#1
Average position
6.7
10.7
1.7
Laatste test
2025
2025
2025
Beschikbare maten
107
101
80

Prestatievergelijking

Gemiddeld uit 3 tests

Natte prestaties
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Firestone Winterhawk 4
78%
Firestone
Winterhawk 4
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Remmen op nat wegdek
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
68%
Firestone Winterhawk 4
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
75%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
Firestone Winterhawk 4
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
82%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
Firestone Winterhawk 4
66%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Aquaplaning longitudinaal
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
84%
Firestone Winterhawk 4
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
92%
Aquaplaning transversaal
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Firestone Winterhawk 4
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Droge prestaties
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
66%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Firestone Winterhawk 4
58%
Firestone
Winterhawk 4
Continental WinterContact TS 870
83%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Droogremmen
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
Firestone Winterhawk 4
62%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
76%
Droge behandeling
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
61%
Firestone Winterhawk 4
53%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Sneeuwprestaties
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
85%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Firestone Winterhawk 4
77%
Firestone
Winterhawk 4
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Remmen op sneeuw
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
90%
Firestone Winterhawk 4
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Tractie op sneeuw
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%
Firestone Winterhawk 4
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
Sneeuwverwerking
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%
Firestone Winterhawk 4
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
84%
Bochten op sneeuw in cirkel
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%
Firestone Winterhawk 4
74%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Prestaties op ijs
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
78%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Firestone Winterhawk 4
82%
Firestone
Winterhawk 4
Continental WinterContact TS 870
78%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Remmen op ijs met abs
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
78%
Firestone Winterhawk 4
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
78%
Comfort & geluid
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
74%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Firestone Winterhawk 4
69%
Firestone
Winterhawk 4
Continental WinterContact TS 870
74%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Exterieurgeluid
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
77%
Firestone Winterhawk 4
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
77%
Rijcomfort
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
71%
Firestone Winterhawk 4
61%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
71%
Economie
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Firestone Winterhawk 4
71%
Firestone
Winterhawk 4
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Rolweerstand
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
Firestone Winterhawk 4
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
Kilometrage
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Firestone Winterhawk 4
61%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%

Tests gebruikt in vergelijking

OrganisatieSeizoenJaarMaat
AUTOBILDAUTOBILD
Winter
2024205/55 R16Bekijk
ADACADAC
Winter
2022185/65 R15Bekijk
AutobildAutobild
Winter
2021205/55 R16Bekijk

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Bekijk algemene vergelijking

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking