Vergelijking: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

Bovenmidden

BFGoodrich

G-FORCE WINTER 2

VS

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

UltraGrip Performance 3

Test profile

G-FORCE WINTER 2

Blizzak LM-005

WinterCraft WP52+

UltraGrip Performance+

Aantal tests

23

49

3

23

Best position

#1

#4

#1

Average position

6.7

3.2

4.3

3.3

Laatste test

2025

2024

2025

Beschikbare maten

107

213

97

176

Nat

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

70%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

90%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

79%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

76%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

84%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

66%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Remmen op nat wegdek

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

67%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

95%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

86%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

86%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

69%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

93%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

86%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

65%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

90%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

82%

Droog

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

82%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Droogremmen

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

81%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Droge behandeling

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

67%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

89%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Droge stuurrespons

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

79%

Droge rijstrook wisselen

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

65%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

74%

Droog rijgedrag

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

73%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

83%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

76%

Droge prestaties

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

69%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

77%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

72%

Sneeuw

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

93%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

78%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Tractie op sneeuw

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

91%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

82%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

76%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Remmen op sneeuw

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

93%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

86%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Sneeuwverwerking

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

90%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

72%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

86%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Sneeuw in bochten

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

89%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

77%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

88%

Sneeuwprestaties

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

93%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

83%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

88%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Zijgeleiding op sneeuw

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

100%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

76%

Soelaas

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

79%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

81%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Buitengeluid

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

83%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

79%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Soelaas

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

74%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

83%

Inwendig geluid

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

85%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Kosten

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

75%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

78%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

71%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Rolweerstand

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

73%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

87%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Kilometrage

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

73%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

64%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Prijs/waarde

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

68%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

60%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

69%

Ijs

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Remmen op ijs

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

80%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

79%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Zijdelingse geleiding van het ijs

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

82%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

86%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Vergelijking: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

G-FORCE WINTER 2

Blizzak LM-005

WinterCraft WP52+

UltraGrip Performance+

Test profile

Nat

Droog

Sneeuw

Soelaas

Kosten

Ijs

Afmetingen en prijzen

Voeg toe aan vergelijking