12 Shops · 123,162+ Products

Vergelijking: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3

Test profile

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001
Pirelli
Winter Sottozero 3
Aantal tests
23
15
27
Best position
#1
#4
#2
Average position
6.7
7.9
8.1
Laatste test
2025
2018
2021
Beschikbare maten
107
132
25

Nat

Nat
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
79%
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
73%
Remmen op nat wegdek
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
62%
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
76%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
80%
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
67%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
87%
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
76%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
80%
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
71%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
67%
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
70%

Droog

Droog
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
82%
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
80%
Droogremmen
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
80%
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
86%
Droge behandeling
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
77%
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
82%
Droog rijgedrag
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
82%
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
53%

Sneeuw

Sneeuw
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
77%
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
78%
Tractie op sneeuw
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
78%
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
69%
Remmen op sneeuw
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
88%
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
76%
Sneeuwverwerking
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
77%
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
81%
Sneeuw in bochten
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
89%
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
77%
Sneeuwprestaties
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
72%

Soelaas

Soelaas
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
50%
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
69%
Buitengeluid
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
75%
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
71%
Soelaas
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
78%
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
76%
Inwendig geluid
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
33%
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
72%

Kosten

Kosten
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
77%
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
73%
Rolweerstand
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
78%
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
81%
Kilometrage
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
76%
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
66%
Prijs/waarde
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
70%
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
55%
Brandstofefficiëntie
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
79%
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
79%

Ijs

Ijs
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
80%
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
74%
Remmen op ijs
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
82%
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
73%
Zijdelingse geleiding van het ijs
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
78%
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
72%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Wederzijdse tests

OrganisatieSeizoenJaarMaat
AutobildAutobild
Winter
2017225/50 R17Bekijk
AutobildAutobild
Winter
2017225/50 R17Bekijk

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking