12 Winkels · 123,162+ Producten

Vergelijking: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Testprofiel

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Aantal tests
23
14
3
24
Beste positie
#1
#1
#2
#1
Gemiddelde positie
6.7
3.6
3.7
2.7
Laatste test
2025
2025
2025
2025
Beschikbare maten
107
188
34
302

Droog

Droog
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Droogremmen
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
56%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Droge behandeling
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
82%
Droge stuurrespons
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Droge rijstrook wisselen
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Droge prestaties
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%

Nat

Nat
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Remmen op nat wegdek
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
86%
Natte prestaties
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
64%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%

Sneeuw

Sneeuw
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Tractie op sneeuw
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Remmen op sneeuw
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Sneeuwverwerking
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
62%
Sneeuw in bochten
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Sneeuwprestaties
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Zijgeleiding op sneeuw
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
98%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%

Soelaas

Soelaas
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
85%
Buitengeluid
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Soelaas
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
81%
Inwendig geluid
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%

Kosten

Kosten
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
70%
Rolweerstand
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Kilometrage
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
28%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%
Prijs/waarde
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
68%

Ijs

Ijs
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking