12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Testprofiel

Yokohama
Bluearth AE-50
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Aantal tests
6
4
5
Beste positie
#6
#2
#1
Gemiddelde positie
11.8
3.3
2.8
Laatste test
2020
2026
2026
Beschikbare maten
12
40
139

Nat

Nat
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
45%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%

Droog

Droog
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Droge behandeling
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Droogremmen
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Buitengeluid
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%

Kosten

Kosten
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Rolweerstand
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking