Vergelijking: Vredestein Ultrac+ vs. Viking Protech NewGen vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Premie

Vredestein

Ultrac+

VS

Vergelijk ook met

UltraContact NXT

Ventus Evo

Cinturato (C3)

Testprofiel

Ultrac+

Protech NewGen

Ventus Evo

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Aantal tests

3

7

5

4

Beste positie

#10

#16

#1

#2

Gemiddelde positie

10.7

32.7

2.8

3.3

Laatste test

2026

Beschikbare maten

79

92

139

40

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nat

Vredestein Ultrac+

83%

Viking Protech NewGen

57%

Hankook Ventus Evo

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

Vredestein Ultrac+

88%

Viking Protech NewGen

71%

Hankook Ventus Evo

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

Vredestein Ultrac+

86%

Viking Protech NewGen

64%

Hankook Ventus Evo

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

71%

Remmen op nat wegdek

Vredestein Ultrac+

83%

Viking Protech NewGen

64%

Hankook Ventus Evo

91%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

84%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Vredestein Ultrac+

83%

Viking Protech NewGen

33%

Hankook Ventus Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Droog

Vredestein Ultrac+

81%

Viking Protech NewGen

68%

Hankook Ventus Evo

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

79%

Droogremmen

Vredestein Ultrac+

77%

Viking Protech NewGen

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Droge behandeling

Vredestein Ultrac+

88%

Hankook Ventus Evo

93%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Kosten

Vredestein Ultrac+

68%

Viking Protech NewGen

84%

Hankook Ventus Evo

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Rolweerstand

Vredestein Ultrac+

73%

Hankook Ventus Evo

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Kilometrage

Vredestein Ultrac+

58%

Viking Protech NewGen

80%

Hankook Ventus Evo

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Soelaas

Vredestein Ultrac+

84%

Viking Protech NewGen

75%

Hankook Ventus Evo

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Soelaas

Vredestein Ultrac+

80%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Buitengeluid

Vredestein Ultrac+

88%

Viking Protech NewGen

73%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Ranglijsten verkennen

Best tyres for evs Beste droge behandeling banden Beste regenbanden Beste handling banden Stilste banden Meest zuinige banden Beste anti-aquaplaning banden

Populaire bandenvergelijkingen

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6

Vergelijk ook

Vredestein Ultrac+ vs Avon ZV7

Vredestein Ultrac+ vs Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

Vredestein Ultrac+ vs Michelin Primacy 5

Viking Protech NewGen vs Avon ZV7

Viking Protech NewGen vs Rotalla Setula 4 Season RA03

Viking Protech NewGen vs Vredestein ULTRAC+

Viking Protech NewGen vs Nexen N blue 4 Season 2

Hankook Ventus Evo vs Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

Bladeren op merk

Vergelijking: Vredestein Ultrac+ vs. Viking Protech NewGen vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ultrac+

Protech NewGen

Ventus Evo

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofiel

Afmetingen en prijzen

Ranglijsten verkennen

Populaire bandenvergelijkingen

Vergelijk ook

Bladeren op merk

Voeg toe aan vergelijking