12 Winkels · 123,162+ Producten

Vergelijking: Vredestein T-Trac 2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Testprofiel

Vredestein
T-Trac 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Aantal tests
1
18
26
Beste positie
#5
#1
#1
Gemiddelde positie
5.0
6.1
2.2
Laatste test
2018
2024
2026
Beschikbare maten
24
47
66

Nat

Nat
Vredestein T-Trac 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Vredestein T-Trac 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Vredestein T-Trac 2
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Vredestein T-Trac 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Vredestein T-Trac 2
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Vredestein T-Trac 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%

Droog

Droog
Vredestein T-Trac 2
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%

Kosten

Kosten
Vredestein T-Trac 2
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Kilometrage
Vredestein T-Trac 2
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Vredestein T-Trac 2
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Buitengeluid
Vredestein T-Trac 2
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
Inwendig geluid
Vredestein T-Trac 2
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
88%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking