12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Vredestein T-Trac 2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage

Testprofiel

Vredestein
T-Trac 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Aantal tests
1
18
14
Beste positie
#5
#1
#8
Gemiddelde positie
5.0
6.1
13.4
Laatste test
2018
2024
2026
Beschikbare maten
24
47
153

Nat

Nat
Vredestein T-Trac 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Vredestein T-Trac 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Vredestein T-Trac 2
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Vredestein T-Trac 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Vredestein T-Trac 2
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Vredestein T-Trac 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Vredestein T-Trac 2
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Buitengeluid
Vredestein T-Trac 2
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%

Droog

Droog
Vredestein T-Trac 2
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%

Kosten

Kosten
Vredestein T-Trac 2
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Kilometrage
Vredestein T-Trac 2
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking