Vergelijking: Viking WinTech vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 vs. Barum Polaris 3 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

Budget

Viking

WinTech

VS

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

UltraGrip Performance 3

Test profile

WinTech

WinterCraft WP52

Polaris 3

UltraGrip Performance+

Aantal tests

6

10

23

Best position

#11

#2

#3

#1

Average position

20.8

12.2

10.6

3.3

Laatste test

2024

2018

2025

Beschikbare maten

59

207

67

176

Nat

Viking WinTech

55%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

70%

Barum Polaris 3

74%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Viking WinTech

52%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

77%

Barum Polaris 3

71%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

Viking WinTech

52%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

64%

Barum Polaris 3

65%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Remmen op nat wegdek

Viking WinTech

61%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

78%

Barum Polaris 3

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

Viking WinTech

62%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

61%

Barum Polaris 3

79%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

82%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

Viking WinTech

46%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

56%

Barum Polaris 3

71%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Sneeuw

Viking WinTech

62%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

72%

Barum Polaris 3

87%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Tractie op sneeuw

Viking WinTech

73%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

71%

Barum Polaris 3

89%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Remmen op sneeuw

Viking WinTech

71%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

73%

Barum Polaris 3

87%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Sneeuwverwerking

Viking WinTech

47%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

74%

Barum Polaris 3

87%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Sneeuw in bochten

Viking WinTech

65%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

70%

Barum Polaris 3

87%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

88%

Droog

Viking WinTech

63%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

73%

Barum Polaris 3

79%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Droogremmen

Viking WinTech

62%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

83%

Barum Polaris 3

71%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Droge behandeling

Viking WinTech

59%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

62%

Barum Polaris 3

87%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Soelaas

Viking WinTech

66%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

62%

Barum Polaris 3

79%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Buitengeluid

Viking WinTech

61%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

60%

Barum Polaris 3

79%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Inwendig geluid

Viking WinTech

71%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

62%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Soelaas

Viking WinTech

50%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

64%

Kosten

Viking WinTech

72%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

70%

Barum Polaris 3

79%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Kilometrage

Viking WinTech

67%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

72%

Barum Polaris 3

68%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Ijs

Viking WinTech

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Vergelijking: Viking WinTech vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 vs. Barum Polaris 3 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

WinTech

WinterCraft WP52

Polaris 3

UltraGrip Performance+

Test profile

Nat

Sneeuw

Droog

Soelaas

Kosten

Ijs

Afmetingen en prijzen

Voeg toe aan vergelijking