Vergelijking: Viking Protech NewGen vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

Budget

Viking

Protech NewGen

VS

UltraGrip Performance+

WinterContact TS 870 P

9.3

R16 – R22

Vergelijk ook met

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

Ventus Evo

Testprofiel

Protech NewGen

UltraGrip Performance+

WinterContact TS 870 P

Aantal tests

7

23

29

Beste positie

#16

#1

Gemiddelde positie

32.7

3.3

3.7

Laatste test

2026

2025

Beschikbare maten

92

176

180

Nat

Viking Protech NewGen

57%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

80%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

Viking Protech NewGen

71%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

81%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

Viking Protech NewGen

64%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

78%

Remmen op nat wegdek

Viking Protech NewGen

64%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

78%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Viking Protech NewGen

33%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

82%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

Viking Protech NewGen

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

82%

Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

81%

Droog

Viking Protech NewGen

68%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

88%

Droogremmen

Viking Protech NewGen

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

76%

Droog rijgedrag

Viking Protech NewGen

48%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

76%

Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

91%

Prestaties op droog wegdek

Viking Protech NewGen

54%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

72%

Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

59%

Soelaas

Viking Protech NewGen

75%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

88%

Buitengeluid

Viking Protech NewGen

73%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

83%

Inwendig geluid

Viking Protech NewGen

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

89%

Kosten

Viking Protech NewGen

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

74%

Kilometrage

Viking Protech NewGen

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

51%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Ranglijsten verkennen

Banden voor ev-auto's Beste droge behandeling banden Beste regenbanden Beste handling banden Stilste banden Meest zuinige banden Beste anti-aquaplaning banden

Populaire bandenvergelijkingen

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3

Vergelijk ook

Viking Protech NewGen vs Avon ZV7

Viking Protech NewGen vs Rotalla Setula 4 Season RA03

Viking Protech NewGen vs Kenda Wintergen 2 KR501

Viking Protech NewGen vs Vredestein ULTRAC+

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs Dunlop WINTER

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs Dunlop Winter Sport 5

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Bladeren op merk

Vergelijking: Viking Protech NewGen vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

Protech NewGen

UltraGrip Performance+

WinterContact TS 870 P

Testprofiel

Nat

Droog

Soelaas

Kosten

Afmetingen en prijzen

Ranglijsten verkennen

Populaire bandenvergelijkingen

Vergelijk ook

Bladeren op merk

Voeg toe aan vergelijking