Vergelijking: Viking Fourtech vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. Dunlop Winter

Budget

Viking

Fourtech

R13 – R19

VS

Premie

Hankook

Vergelijk ook met

PILOT ALPIN 5

SportContact 7

WinterContact TS 870

Testprofiel

Fourtech

ION Evo

e.Ziex

UltraGrip Performance 3

Winter

Aantal tests

5

1

3

24

2

Beste positie

#11

#1

#2

#1

Gemiddelde positie

17.0

1.0

3.7

2.7

1.5

Laatste test

2021

2025

Beschikbare maten

32

64

34

302

65

Nat

Viking Fourtech

70%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

83%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Remmen op nat wegdek

Viking Fourtech

71%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

80%

Dunlop Winter

84%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

Viking Fourtech

55%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

86%

Dunlop Winter

63%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Viking Fourtech

59%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

91%

Dunlop Winter

67%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

Viking Fourtech

96%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

74%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

Viking Fourtech

77%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

74%

Dunlop Winter

71%

Sneeuw

Viking Fourtech

71%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

75%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Remmen op sneeuw

Viking Fourtech

82%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

77%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Sneeuw in bochten

Viking Fourtech

67%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

79%

Dunlop Winter

96%

Sneeuwverwerking

Viking Fourtech

71%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

62%

Dunlop Winter

79%

Tractie op sneeuw

Viking Fourtech

51%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

79%

Dunlop Winter

96%

Kosten

Viking Fourtech

84%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

70%

Dunlop Winter

83%

Rolweerstand

Viking Fourtech

96%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

75%

Dunlop Winter

81%

Kilometrage

Viking Fourtech

65%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

56%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Prijs/waarde

Viking Fourtech

77%

Hankook ION Evo

60%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

68%

Dunlop Winter

84%

Soelaas

Viking Fourtech

76%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

85%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Soelaas

Viking Fourtech

66%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

73%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Buitengeluid

Viking Fourtech

76%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

80%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Droog

Viking Fourtech

59%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

79%

Dunlop Winter

69%

Droogremmen

Viking Fourtech

47%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

72%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Droge behandeling

Viking Fourtech

71%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

82%

Dunlop Winter

64%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Vergelijking: Viking Fourtech vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. Dunlop Winter

Fourtech

ION Evo

e.Ziex

UltraGrip Performance 3

Winter

Testprofiel

Nat

Sneeuw

Kosten

Soelaas

Droog

Afmetingen en prijzen

Voeg toe aan vergelijking