12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Viking Fourtech vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Testprofiel

Viking
Fourtech
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Aantal tests
5
23
29
14
Beste positie
#11
#1
#1
#1
Gemiddelde positie
17.0
3.3
3.7
3.6
Laatste test
2021
2025
2025
2025
Beschikbare maten
32
176
180
194

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Viking Fourtech
70%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Viking Fourtech
96%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Viking Fourtech
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Viking Fourtech
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Viking Fourtech
55%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Viking Fourtech
59%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Sneeuw
Viking Fourtech
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Sneeuw in bochten
Viking Fourtech
67%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Sneeuwverwerking
Viking Fourtech
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
65%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
Tractie op sneeuw
Viking Fourtech
51%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Remmen op sneeuw
Viking Fourtech
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Kosten
Viking Fourtech
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Prijs/waarde
Viking Fourtech
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
49%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Rolweerstand
Viking Fourtech
96%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
92%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Kilometrage
Viking Fourtech
65%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
51%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Soelaas
Viking Fourtech
76%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Buitengeluid
Viking Fourtech
76%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Soelaas
Viking Fourtech
66%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Droog
Viking Fourtech
59%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Droogremmen
Viking Fourtech
47%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Droge behandeling
Viking Fourtech
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store