Vergelijking: Viking Fourtech vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Vredestein Quatrac

Budget

Viking

Fourtech

R13 – R19

VS

Premie

GoodYear

Vergelijk ook met

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Testprofiel

Fourtech

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

e.Ziex

Quatrac

Aantal tests

5

3

5

3

16

Beste positie

#11

#2

#1

#2

#1

Gemiddelde positie

17.0

3.3

2.2

3.7

3.1

Laatste test

2021

2026

2025

Beschikbare maten

32

40

63

34

86

Nat

Viking Fourtech

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Vredestein Quatrac

87%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Viking Fourtech

59%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Vredestein Quatrac

92%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

Viking Fourtech

96%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Vredestein Quatrac

82%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

Viking Fourtech

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Vredestein Quatrac

84%

Remmen op nat wegdek

Viking Fourtech

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Vredestein Quatrac

86%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

Viking Fourtech

55%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Vredestein Quatrac

88%

Sneeuw

Viking Fourtech

71%

Vredestein Quatrac

81%

Sneeuw in bochten

Viking Fourtech

67%

Vredestein Quatrac

74%

Sneeuwverwerking

Viking Fourtech

71%

Vredestein Quatrac

83%

Tractie op sneeuw

Viking Fourtech

51%

Vredestein Quatrac

79%

Remmen op sneeuw

Viking Fourtech

82%

Vredestein Quatrac

84%

Kosten

Viking Fourtech

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Vredestein Quatrac

67%

Kilometrage

Viking Fourtech

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Vredestein Quatrac

56%

Prijs/waarde

Viking Fourtech

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

87%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Vredestein Quatrac

64%

Rolweerstand

Viking Fourtech

96%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Vredestein Quatrac

77%

Soelaas

Viking Fourtech

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Vredestein Quatrac

88%

Buitengeluid

Viking Fourtech

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Vredestein Quatrac

86%

Soelaas

Viking Fourtech

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Vredestein Quatrac

78%

Droog

Viking Fourtech

59%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Vredestein Quatrac

82%

Droogremmen

Viking Fourtech

47%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Vredestein Quatrac

79%

Droge behandeling

Viking Fourtech

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Vredestein Quatrac

81%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Vergelijking: Viking Fourtech vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Vredestein Quatrac

Fourtech

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

e.Ziex

Quatrac

Testprofiel

Nat

Sneeuw

Kosten

Soelaas

Droog

Afmetingen en prijzen

Voeg toe aan vergelijking