Vergelijking: Viking Fourtech vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental SportContact 7

Budget

Viking

Fourtech

R13 – R19

VS

Premie

GoodYear

Vergelijk ook met

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 4 S

Pilot Sport 5

Testprofiel

Fourtech

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

SportContact 7

Aantal tests

5

3

15

Beste positie

#11

#2

#1

Gemiddelde positie

17.0

3.3

3.7

1.2

Laatste test

2021

2026

2025

2026

Beschikbare maten

32

40

34

122

Nat

Viking Fourtech

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Continental SportContact 7

84%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

Viking Fourtech

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Continental SportContact 7

85%

Remmen op nat wegdek

Viking Fourtech

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Continental SportContact 7

95%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

Viking Fourtech

55%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Continental SportContact 7

86%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Viking Fourtech

59%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Continental SportContact 7

89%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

Viking Fourtech

96%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Continental SportContact 7

66%

Sneeuw

Viking Fourtech

71%

Kosten

Viking Fourtech

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Continental SportContact 7

79%

Rolweerstand

Viking Fourtech

96%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Continental SportContact 7

79%

Kilometrage

Viking Fourtech

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Soelaas

Viking Fourtech

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Continental SportContact 7

78%

Buitengeluid

Viking Fourtech

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Continental SportContact 7

75%

Droog

Viking Fourtech

59%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Continental SportContact 7

91%

Droogremmen

Viking Fourtech

47%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Continental SportContact 7

97%

Droge behandeling

Viking Fourtech

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Continental SportContact 7

94%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Vergelijking: Viking Fourtech vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental SportContact 7

Fourtech

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

SportContact 7

Testprofiel

Nat

Sneeuw

Kosten

Soelaas

Droog

Afmetingen en prijzen

Voeg toe aan vergelijking