12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Viking Fourtech vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental SportContact 7

Testprofiel

Viking
Fourtech
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
ION FlexClimate
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
SportContact 7
Aantal tests
5
18
1
3
4
16
Beste positie
#11
#1
#1
#2
#2
#1
Gemiddelde positie
17.0
6.1
1.0
3.7
3.3
1.2
Laatste test
2021
2024
2025
2025
2026
2026
Beschikbare maten
32
47
27
36
40
124

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Viking Fourtech
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental SportContact 7
84%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Viking Fourtech
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental SportContact 7
95%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Viking Fourtech
55%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental SportContact 7
87%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Viking Fourtech
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental SportContact 7
89%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Viking Fourtech
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental SportContact 7
66%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Viking Fourtech
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
95%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental SportContact 7
84%
Sneeuw
Viking Fourtech
71%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
75%
Kosten
Viking Fourtech
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental SportContact 7
77%
Rolweerstand
Viking Fourtech
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental SportContact 7
77%
Kilometrage
Viking Fourtech
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Droog
Viking Fourtech
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental SportContact 7
91%
Droogremmen
Viking Fourtech
47%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental SportContact 7
96%
Droge behandeling
Viking Fourtech
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental SportContact 7
94%
Soelaas
Viking Fourtech
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental SportContact 7
78%
Buitengeluid
Viking Fourtech
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental SportContact 7
75%
Soelaas
Viking Fourtech
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Continental SportContact 7
70%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store