12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Viking Fourtech vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Testprofiel

Viking
Fourtech
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
ION FlexClimate
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Aantal tests
5
18
1
3
4
28
Beste positie
#11
#1
#1
#2
#2
#1
Gemiddelde positie
17.0
6.1
1.0
3.7
3.3
2.3
Laatste test
2021
2024
2025
2025
2026
2026
Beschikbare maten
32
47
27
36
40
67

Nat

Nat
Viking Fourtech
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Viking Fourtech
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Viking Fourtech
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Viking Fourtech
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
95%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Viking Fourtech
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Viking Fourtech
55%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%

Sneeuw

Sneeuw
Viking Fourtech
71%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
75%

Kosten

Kosten
Viking Fourtech
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Kilometrage
Viking Fourtech
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Prijs/waarde
Viking Fourtech
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Rolweerstand
Viking Fourtech
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Viking Fourtech
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Buitengeluid
Viking Fourtech
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%

Droog

Droog
Viking Fourtech
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Droogremmen
Viking Fourtech
47%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Droge behandeling
Viking Fourtech
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking