12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Viking Fourtech vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Testprofiel

Viking
Fourtech
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION FlexClimate
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Aantal tests
5
18
4
1
5
3
Beste positie
#11
#1
#2
#1
#1
#1
Gemiddelde positie
17.0
6.1
3.3
1.0
2.8
1.3
Laatste test
2021
2024
2026
2025
2026
2026
Beschikbare maten
32
47
40
27
139
23

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Viking Fourtech
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Viking Fourtech
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
95%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Viking Fourtech
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Viking Fourtech
55%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Viking Fourtech
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Viking Fourtech
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
Sneeuw
Viking Fourtech
71%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
75%
Kosten
Viking Fourtech
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
Rolweerstand
Viking Fourtech
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Continental UltraContact NXT
83%
Kilometrage
Viking Fourtech
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
85%
Soelaas
Viking Fourtech
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Buitengeluid
Viking Fourtech
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Droog
Viking Fourtech
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
Droogremmen
Viking Fourtech
47%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Droge behandeling
Viking Fourtech
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Continental UltraContact NXT
98%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store