12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Viking Fourtech vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental SportContact 7

Testprofiel

Viking
Fourtech
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
SportContact 7
Aantal tests
5
18
4
6
3
16
Beste positie
#11
#1
#2
#3
#2
#1
Gemiddelde positie
17.0
6.1
3.3
4.7
3.7
1.2
Laatste test
2021
2024
2026
2026
2025
2026
Beschikbare maten
32
47
40
146
36
124

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Viking Fourtech
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental SportContact 7
84%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Viking Fourtech
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental SportContact 7
95%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Viking Fourtech
55%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental SportContact 7
87%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Viking Fourtech
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental SportContact 7
89%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Viking Fourtech
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental SportContact 7
66%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Viking Fourtech
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental SportContact 7
84%
Sneeuw
Viking Fourtech
71%
Kosten
Viking Fourtech
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental SportContact 7
77%
Rolweerstand
Viking Fourtech
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental SportContact 7
77%
Kilometrage
Viking Fourtech
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Droog
Viking Fourtech
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental SportContact 7
91%
Droogremmen
Viking Fourtech
47%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental SportContact 7
96%
Droge behandeling
Viking Fourtech
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental SportContact 7
94%
Soelaas
Viking Fourtech
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental SportContact 7
78%
Buitengeluid
Viking Fourtech
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental SportContact 7
75%
Soelaas
Viking Fourtech
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Continental SportContact 7
70%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store