12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Viking Fourtech vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Testprofiel

Viking
Fourtech
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Hankook
ION Evo
Aantal tests
5
18
6
4
28
1
Beste positie
#11
#1
#3
#2
#1
#1
Gemiddelde positie
17.0
6.1
4.7
3.3
2.3
1.0
Laatste test
2021
2024
2026
2026
2026
2025
Beschikbare maten
32
47
146
40
67
66

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nat
Viking Fourtech
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Viking Fourtech
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Viking Fourtech
55%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Viking Fourtech
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Viking Fourtech
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Viking Fourtech
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Sneeuw
Viking Fourtech
71%
Kosten
Viking Fourtech
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rolweerstand
Viking Fourtech
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Kilometrage
Viking Fourtech
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Prijs/waarde
Viking Fourtech
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Soelaas
Viking Fourtech
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Buitengeluid
Viking Fourtech
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Droog
Viking Fourtech
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Droogremmen
Viking Fourtech
47%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Droge behandeling
Viking Fourtech
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store