12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Viking Fourtech vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Testprofiel

Viking
Fourtech
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION FlexClimate
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Aantal tests
5
18
3
4
1
28
Beste positie
#11
#1
#2
#2
#1
#1
Gemiddelde positie
17.0
6.1
3.7
3.3
1.0
2.3
Laatste test
2021
2024
2025
2026
2025
2026
Beschikbare maten
32
47
36
40
27
67

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nat
Viking Fourtech
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Viking Fourtech
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Viking Fourtech
55%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Viking Fourtech
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Viking Fourtech
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Viking Fourtech
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
95%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Sneeuw
Viking Fourtech
71%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
75%
Kosten
Viking Fourtech
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Rolweerstand
Viking Fourtech
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Kilometrage
Viking Fourtech
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Prijs/waarde
Viking Fourtech
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Soelaas
Viking Fourtech
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Buitengeluid
Viking Fourtech
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Droog
Viking Fourtech
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Droogremmen
Viking Fourtech
47%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Droge behandeling
Viking Fourtech
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store