Vergelijking: Viking Fourtech vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Budget

Viking

Fourtech

R13 – R19

VS

Bovenmidden

Falken

Vergelijk ook met

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

Pilot Sport 5

Testprofiel

Fourtech

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION FlexClimate

PremiumContact 7

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Aantal tests

5

3

1

26

5

Beste positie

#11

#2

#1

Gemiddelde positie

17.0

3.7

3.3

1.0

2.2

Laatste test

2021

2025

2026

2025

2026

2025

Beschikbare maten

32

34

40

27

66

63

Nat

Viking Fourtech

70%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Viking Fourtech

59%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

Viking Fourtech

96%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

Viking Fourtech

77%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

95%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Remmen op nat wegdek

Viking Fourtech

71%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Continental PremiumContact 7

94%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

Viking Fourtech

55%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Continental PremiumContact 7

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Sneeuw

Viking Fourtech

71%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

75%

Kosten

Viking Fourtech

84%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Kilometrage

Viking Fourtech

65%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Continental PremiumContact 7

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Prijs/waarde

Viking Fourtech

77%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Continental PremiumContact 7

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

87%

Rolweerstand

Viking Fourtech

96%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Soelaas

Viking Fourtech

76%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

78%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Buitengeluid

Viking Fourtech

76%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

81%

Continental PremiumContact 7

69%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Droog

Viking Fourtech

59%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Droogremmen

Viking Fourtech

47%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Droge behandeling

Viking Fourtech

71%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Continental PremiumContact 7

85%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Vergelijking: Viking Fourtech vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Fourtech

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION FlexClimate

PremiumContact 7

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Testprofiel

Nat

Sneeuw

Kosten

Soelaas

Droog

Afmetingen en prijzen

Voeg toe aan vergelijking